Friday, August 31, 2012

...a profetico update on Iran and Israel ...! THE MESSIAH STORY IS BEING MADE TRUE more than once !













http://abiteinthechunk.blogspot.ca/2012/08/nuke-powers-push-globe-to-apocalypse.html

PROPHETICAL UPDATE ON IRAN and ISRAEL: what was studied about in the above blog posting has a very highly possible alternatives !

...nobody came in to save Lybia, from any of the Arabs, nor did the Chavez-Venezuela, nor China nor Russia...!

...though Russia and China always oppose interventions in other countries un-rests ! they have never gone to war, other than the Russia-Afganistan, etc.

...SO FOLKS I DOUBT THAT IRAN IS GETTING ANY HELP FROM ANYBODY Either !

NOBODY IS GOING TO RISK A FULL BLOWN Valley of Meguido Armageddon, not even if Israel tried to do so !  YOU KNOW WHY ? They are too greedy and self centered, and over comfortable with their powerful lives over their eternal slaves populations, to do so !

WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW IS IF A MODERN "Crusades" is going to happen, as to help for ISRAEL !

By the looks of it: Israel has the American-Bible follower All mighty power U.S.A. in line with them ! HOW FANTASTIC TO HAVE MANAGED OVER so many near exterminations of JEWS, to have gotten their MESSIAH for WW-2 and now IRAN, through U.S.A. Believe me it is astounding ! Very few of us get a Messiah for our beliefs, ideals and work !

Now the Catholic Vatican has their eternal for ever since ever Messiahs: ITALY, SWISS and World Governments ! More than fantastic ! You can be and have government presence and even a small country without one weapon ! You become a Religion imposed by "Inquisition", torture, illegal detentions and government authorized deaths ! THAT IS BETTER THAN BEING A COUNTRY!  But on top of that theY managed to make a country guarded by the SWISS GUARD ! DOES ANYBODY FIND ANY SENSE IN THIS AND THE SWISS ??? Because I do not!

WE DO NOT KNOW OF ANY SUICIDAL leader or Military, to start a World Nuclear War ! BUT IT WOULD ONLY TAKE ONE INTER-CONTINENTAL MISSILE FULLY LOADED WITH NUCLEAR HEADS, to start it...!

THIS IS THE PURE LOGIC THEORY OF " "ONLY ONE , PLEASE...! it would only take one...!"

The theory of EVOLUTION in clear "question"! Testicles in first mammal forms of the first forms of life with sperm, developed enough of it to ensure a "egg" fertilization! HOW LONG DID THIS TAKE, before extermination?

ONCE AGAIN THE THEORY of weaponization, the male millions and millions of "sperm" AND ONE OBJECTIVE, or only one sperm to do the damage! HOW MOTHER NATURE stopped at one cygote or two or a few more pairs, to make a feasible amount of offspring ! MORE THAN an Evolutionary Miracle!

.
.
.





Thursday, August 30, 2012

...the venezuela amuay explosion vs. a north american nuclear power plant "melt_down"...!
























U.S.A. Going Nuclear Power "Nut heads" self risk "melt-'down'..." destruction...!

http://devilsexcrement.com/2012/08/30/venezuelan-governmentt-spins-on-amuay-disaster-evidence-mounts-of-insufficient-maintenance/#comment-37152
Contal de que no vole, digo explote o sobre calientei un reactor nuclear de Estados Unidos ! Compaladre, yo duermou tranquilito en mi casita de madera y cables directos dentro de la madera sin conductos de metal, como todas las casas[cazas] de Norte America ! Caray pa que casas de concreto quedaran pol el suelo, que bombasou ! Es veldad ! Un escape a veces no sei sabe cuanto peligroso es el !

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/1247155--massive-explosion-kills-26-at-venezuela-s-biggest-refinery


...Venezuela Amuay explosion destroyed concrete cement Latin/Spanish style safer housing than poor wooden housing of North America...!

...Imagine a nuclear plant melt'down' in North America...!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_reactors#United_States_of_America
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_the_United_States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prospective_nuclear_units_in_the_United_States

TO MY NUMBERS THE RISK IS WORSE THAN THE BENEFIT ...!

.
.
.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

‘Nuke powers push globe to apocalypse’ - are all humans that loving and sane ?









‘Nuke powers push globe to apocalypse’
 http://abiteinthechunk.blogspot.ca/2012/08/nuke-powers-push-globe-to-apocalypse.html

It is said that only U.S.A with out any other help can destroy all the World, as to major cities.
That all nations together can destroy with atomic bombs the World completely !
When you can do that, it means you wanted to get to that power !
They will destroy most of the World with Capitalism and Over-Population anyway !
So are World leaders evil, or a special form of educated or not so educated psychopaths ?
THIS ANSWER IS: both of the above ! AND WE SEE THEM ON TV and any media, as "normal" accepted human beings !


[[["...
A political analyst has lashed out at the West’s campaign to halt Iran’s nuclear energy program, while the colossal nuclear stockpile of the global powers is pushing the world to the brink of a nuclear apocalypse.


“With over 2000 highly operational nuclear weapons already in the world, it seems ridiculously ironic to try to attribute global insecurity to Iranian nuclear energy program which the US, Israel and some western countries claim to include military purposes,” Dr. Ismail Salami said in an article published on the Press TV website.

The author noted that instead of focusing on Iran's peaceful nuclear energy program on merely political grounds, the international community should be concerned about “the states in possession of the myriad nuclear bombs across the world.”

Relying on figures released by the arms control website, Salami argued that despite western countries’ obsession over Iran's nuclear energy program, they themselves pose the most dire threat to global security as they possess the highest number of nuclear warheads, especially highly operational warheads.

By definition, the analyst noted, highly operational denotes nuclear warheads which “can be shot at any desired time.”

Quoting statistics published by the Arms Control Association, Salami further stated that while the United States possesses about 5,000 total warheads, 1,737 of which are operational, Russia, France, and UK alone possess a total of over 1,900 deployed strategic warheads which are ready to be fired at any moment.

“In addition to the aforementioned report, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) revealed in June that at the start of 2012, eight states - the United States, Russia, the UK, France, China, India, Pakistan and Israel - possessed approximately 4,400 operational nuclear weapons. Nearly 2,000 of these are kept in a state of high operational alert. If all nuclear warheads are counted, these states together possess a total of approximately 19,000 nuclear weapons.”

Salami noted that even Israel possesses 80 highly operational nuclear warheads.

“Israel, which follows a policy of nuclear ambiguity, [is] … widely known to possess 300 to 400 nuclear warheads with 80 of them in high operational alert according to SIPRI, that is, they are ready to fire.”..."]]]



... ‘Nuke powers push globe to apocalypse’ - are all humans that loving and sane ?
THEY ARE AL "SANE ENOUGH" is the correct answer ...!

...to have such a arsenal that could eliminate normal life on this Planet, is "in-sane enough"...!

...to believe in "peasants-poordom-slavery-hunger-wars" is the worst "insanity" more than mere "evil"...!

AGAIN IRAN CANNOT GET A NUCLEAR  ATOMIC BOMB...! Simple ! They once conquered ancient Worlds and even Israel and Jerusalem in the Crusades ! Arabs once ruled much of Europe ! They will try to do it again, under the freedom of immigration and freedom of religions ! ALL WE NEED IS A ATOMIC WEAPONS ARABS STATE to start the biggest problems the World has had after WW-II !

Iran would not be doing what they are doing unless they had bad intentions, as they will not get anymore progress for their population, if they have sacrificed their population already under the embargo's over the nuclear atomic weapons issue ! This is obvious ! YOU DO NOT SACRIFICE A POPULATION, for what is not going to help a population that is already being sacrificed ! OBVIOUS !

So folks, Israel attacks Iran hard conventionally, and then does Hiroshima on them ! Who is going to stop them ? A nuclear atomic counterattack and from whom ? Russia or China, or Packistan or India ? I DO NOT KNOW ! DO YOU?

I DO NOT THINK U.S.A has to do anything, if they are "intelligent" enough ! YOU ARE SMART: this time you wait and see ! IT IS YOUR BEST OPTION ! Believe me ! DO NOT MUCK IT UP KNOW after so many "successes" ! IF USA is going headlong in, dragged again by ISRAEL and their "Judaic Religion" it could be devastating ! LET THE JEWS, muck themselves this time !

If U.S.A gets hit in anyway in the aftermath, then "yahoouuuuuu"...! TANGO ! Please U.S.A. do not "muck" it up this time ! WHAT THE HECK ? You might not solve it as easy, doing pre-emptive ! Unless you do a complete full blown WAR and real hard probably more than conventional - to make a full stop! And they will have time to counter-attack, and who knows who else might AID them !
.
.
.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

...more religious/governments techniques of perpetration of absurdities !













"more religious/governments techniques of perpetration of absurdities !"


THE MIRACLE OF Jesus [the/a Christ] WALKING ON WATER !
...i wonder what do you use on your feet ?
                           

_____________________________
(Matt 14:25 [Darby])
But in the fourth watch of the night he went off to them, walking on the sea.

(Matt 14:26 [Darby])
And the disciples, seeing him walking on the sea, were troubled, saying, It is an apparition. And they cried out through fear.

(Matt 14:27 [Darby])
But Jesus immediately spoke to them, saying, Take courage; it is *I*: be not afraid.

(Matt 14:28 [Darby])
And Peter answering him said, Lord, if it be *thou*, command me to come to thee upon the waters.

(Matt 14:29 [Darby])
And he said, Come. And Peter, having descended from the ship, walked upon the waters to go to Jesus.

(Matt 14:30 [Darby])
But seeing the wind strong he was afraid; and beginning to sink he cried out, saying, Lord, save me.

(Matt 14:31 [Darby])
And immediately Jesus stretched out his hand and caught hold of him, and says to him, O thou of little faith, why didst thou doubt?

(Matt 14:32 [Darby])
And when they had gone up into the ship, the wind fell.

(Matt 14:33 [Darby])
But those in the ship came and did homage to him, saying, Truly thou art God's Son.

_____________________________


(Matt 14:25 [Hin])
और वह रात के चौथे पहर फील पर चलते हुए उन के पास आया।

_____________________________

(Matt 14:25 [HEBm])
(Matt 14:25 [HEBm])
ויהי באשמרת הרביעית ויבא אליהם ישוע מתהלך על פני הים׃

_____________________________

(Matt 14:25 [CNETs])
夜  将 尽 的 时 候, 耶 稣 在 海 面 上 走 往 门 徒 那 里 去。

_____________________________




...MORE FALSE PROOFS OF THE DEITY of the so called Jesus, the(a) Christ !

...if jesus really waked on deep water or not is a technicality, for whom made all things !
what is wrong is the logic: how could peter do it ? 
a miracle and gift from god ? no !
what really happened is that jesus was surfboarding or other and in the darkness of the night it would be easy to trick !

JESUS DO YOUR MIRACLES IN PLAIN "DAYLIGHT", in this case, and more than once, and to more than one person: Peter, AND NOT IN A STORM, FOR ALL OF US TO REALLY SEE !

...in old times you were put to death for not bowing, or offering to the Goddess "Diana" or other !
...today in Modern 21st North America, they have wrongly defined hate speech against "religion" or other !
...today in Modern 21st North America, at a only Everett, WA, USA Hospital publicly religious with a cross all over it, you are asked of what religion are you ?

...today, in year 2006, venezuela catholic dispensaries refused to attend and provide government help and supplies to some evangelical indians, still professing their modern indoctrination of UN-doubtedly wrong beliefs but good morale and behavior ! [do google search TSJ Venezuela]

...why can't the government teach aboriginal people's moral and good living ? why depend on religions and their deforming generally wrong logic and ideas ? only spanish and few others have preserved these aboriginals people's in their own habitat and world ! english only gave them reservations areas ! and these cultures of aboriginal nations are dying ! dying of white mans sicknesses and wrong life styles !                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
...i do not know where has everybody's heads and minds gone to, as to progress, and your own freedoms of beliefs, and speech and self expression ?
I REFUSE TO SUBMIT TO THEIR repressive mentalities of zero criticism of absurdities !
.
.
.

...i think the cards are already thrown for the stupid Iranian's !










‘Obama lurching toward nuclear war by threatening Iran’
http://presstv.com/detail/2012/08/25/258067/iran-war-prelude-to-nuclear-armageddon/

[[["...Irresponsible leaders risk the unthinkable. Media scoundrels cheerlead mindlessly. So do neocon think tanks. Ordinary people are more concerned about mundane trivia than survival.


Nero didn't fiddle while Rome burned. The violin wasn't invented for another 1,500 years. Today's officials go where earlier ones wouldn't dare. They risk regional or global disaster. War on Syria and/or Iran may ignite more than leaders bargain for.

Imagine blowing up the world to control it. Imagine forces able to stop it staying sidelined. Imagine the unimaginable. Imagine it before it's too late to matter.

World War II weapons were toys compared to today's. Before war ended, tens of millions died. Estimates range from 50 - 70 million. No one knows for sure. Preventing war would have saved them. Hoped for never again became perpetual conflicts.

Only America [has] used nuclear weapons. It's not working to avoid potential catastrophe. It wants advantageous geopolitical positioning and dominance. Mutually assured destruction so far worked. Fail-safe days may be ending.

Attacking Syria risks Russian and perhaps Chinese intervention. War on Iran entails that risk and more. Washington's arsenal includes weapons too dangerous to use..."]]]


...believe it or not, the middle east could go "ugly", and worse if china and russia retaliate against israel/usa coalition !
...this is unbelievable after the terrible results of WWII with 50million-70million dead...!
...well unbelievable things do happen, and americans politicians are getting "itchy" to take the "credit" for the "war" of pre-eminense and control !
...will Obama have time before elections this year in november ? i doubt it very much ! or lets say: take the "credit" for saving the World and Israel, or really starting a "Armageddon"...! Iran has quite a big retaliation power in a short given time frame...!
...if nobody else gets into the fray, USA/Israel could come clean enough out of it...!
...CAN ANYBODY IN THEIR 'SANE MINDS', BELIEVE THAT netanyahu[yahoo] and obama_osama[barack_balack] be the ones to blame for more big jewish deaths, and even a middle east conflagration ???
Because I am nearly sure that "mitty" is more than itching to do it...!

BUT THERE IS ALWAYS THE "BUT": I DO NOT KNOW HOW IRAN THINKS THEY CAN NUKE ISRAEL, WITHOUT THEMSELVES BEING OBLITERATED??? 
And would the nuke on Israel be big enough or worse than the resulting damage of a Israel preemptive strike on Iran???
So unless "Iran"-be suicidal, I doubt Iran will nuke Israel ever, and I think it is all "hog-wash"...! What can the World loose with a "Atomic bomb Iran" ? nothing if they are not suicidal ! if they be suicidal ! why not wait and blow them out of this World for good ? too much crude oil involved could be the answer ! And sacrifice conventional damages to Israel !
BUT AGAIN: IRAN has to be proven to be suicidal and nuke Israel ! Or will they join up with Pakistan and India, etc? EEEEeeeeeek! Then we are in trouble !

SO WHAT IS THE EQUATION to solve Israel and USA ? Prepare yourselves slowly, and protect Israel, and let those that want to leave, leave ! That is the solution ! Just in case ! Upps, I am not supossed to be commandeering !
Remember, never doubt something different could happen, and that is the Russia/China/etc equation !

If your data is correct and your intel, I THINK YOUR MINDS ARE "COOKING" AT THE MOMENT !
IF IT WERE CANADA MAKING THE DECISIONS, they would prefer to wait and see ! AN ATOMIC WEAPONRY IS ALSO A FORMIDABLE DETERRENT !  i would place atomic weaponry as near as possible to Iran as a deterrent as quick counter attack!
AND AS FAR AS I KNOW: i do not know what can benefit Iran with a nuke strike on Israel !
WHAT IS NOT NOW or I do not Know, AND THAT IS: HOW STRONG CAN YOU LET IRAN GET before you get "wary" and feeling "funny"...???
I THINK THE CARDS ARE ALREADY THROWN ...! AND IT IS JUST A MATTER OF TIME for so stupid Iranians !

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2193246/Why-Im-convinced-Israel-bomb-Iran-weeks-Netanyahu-running-patience-closer-launching-strike.html?ITO=1490
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-obama-divided-on-price-of-israeli-strike-against-iran-1.416909
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/daniel-greenfield/why-an-israel-strike-on-iran-will-happen-before-the-election/
http://rt.com/news/missile-tossing-iran-israel-457/

.
.
.



Friday, August 24, 2012

...Baa, baa, black sheep !








YOUR MATTRESS ! AND YOUR CLOTHING !
AND YOUR SHOES !
IT IS ALL A MATTER OF TIME OR LUCK FOR YOUR GOOD HEALTH !


http://www.healthy-vitamins-rx.com/html/toxic-mattress.html
http://www.shepherdsdream.com/p-26-all-natural-4-wool-mattress.aspx

_________________________
Baa, baa, black sheep,
Have you any wool?
Yes, sir, yes, sir,
Three bags full;
One for the master,
And one for the dame,
And one for the little boy
Who lives down the lane.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baa,_Baa,_Black_Sheep
__________________________


Toxic Mattreses

We know this website is about vitamins, but we also know that most people reading it are interested in good health.  We just think that good health is impossible when you are spending 1/3 of your life sleeping on a toxic mattress, so we put together this page on mattresses.

Non-Toxic Mattress & Bedding Extremely Important For Health

We are firm believers in non-toxic houses, but we realize that most people cannot change their entire house overnight.  However, your bedroom should really be an "oasis" in the middle of all the chemicals you encounter all day long, a place of respite, where you can get a good night's sleep and allow your body to rejuvenate itself.  If you are sick with any kind of chronic disease like cancer or asthma, you probably need a chemical-free bedroom more than others.  Perhaps the most important thing in your bedroom is your mattress, bedding, and the bed frame, since you are so close to it all night long (we also highly recommend hard flooring in the bedroom and no particle board furniture).

Standard Mattresses are Toxic

Did you know that there are actually more chemicals in a conventional mattress today than are contained in a barrel of oil?  Yes, that's right, most mattresses are made entirely of petrochemicals!  Most people today sleep on mattresses made of synthetic materials like polyurethane, polyester and flame retardant chemicals.*  These synthetic materials and the flame retardant chemicals in the mattresses cause us to breathe in toxins all night long, including PBDEs (polyborminated diphenyl ethers), formaldehyde and more.

*  A 1973 law required mattresses to not ignite from a burning cigarette, but a new law requires mattresses to not ignite after being exposed to a 12 inch wide flame on the side for 50 seconds, and a simultaneous 10 inch wide flame on the top for 70 seconds.  So how many more chemicals do you think will be in your mattress so it can withstand a couple blow torches aimed at it for around a minute??

Mattress Flame Retardant Chemicals

PBDE, a flame retardant chemical, has actually been banned in Europe because of toxicity.  It will be banned in California starting in 2008, but for now they are letting the mattress manufacturers sell out their stock to the unsuspecting public.  PBDE has been shown to cause all sorts of health problems, including cognitive and behavior changes during development, thyroid problems, permanent learning and memory impairment, ADHD, higher cancer rates and immune system problems.  It is now found in high levels in mother's breast milk, undoubtedly due to its presence in our mattresses, and so is being ingested by babies, even though it has been shown to be much more toxic for infants and children.

Some other flame retardant chemicals used in mattress production include formaldehyde, antimony trioxide, boric acid (the roach killer) melamine and decabromodiphenyl oxide (a brominated flame retardant also being found in women's breast milk).  Formaldehyde can cause headaches, insomnia, fatigue, excessive thirst, respiratory problems and more.  Boric acid was found to be very toxic and even caused some deaths when used in a 3% diluted solution as a topical solution for diaper rash, but now it is used on mattresses, even crib mattresses!  Many of these chemicals are known or suspected carcinogens.  Some cause reproductive, liver, kidney, heart muscle and other damage.  In addition, although flame retardant chemicals will keep the mattress from catching fire, you may not realize that if there is a fire, poisonous gases such as cyanide and carbon monoxide will be created that you will breathe in if you are near your mattress.

Other Chemicals in Mattress Materials

The chemicals used in making polyester that is a common mattress material that is possibly carcinogenic and may also damage the kidneys, the heart and the nervous system.  All sorts of chemicals in conventional mattresses cause negative health effects ranging from headaches to cancer.  Nighttime is when our bodies are supposed to be detoxifying, repairing and rejuvenating themselves.  Do you really want to be sleeping on a mattress that is full of toxic chemicals, including ones banned for health reasons in other countries?

Metals in Your Bed and Bed Frame

Many people have mattresses and box springs with coils in them, as well as metal frames for their beds.  These metal mattress coils are used for buoyancy, but it seems that they not only provide an unnatural type of support, but they also disrupt our natural electromagnetic field, which can cause all sorts of physical and other stresses of a subtle, yet profound nature.  This is of course hard to prove, but there are many people who say they sleep so much better with no metal in their mattress or bed frame and no electrical current running near their mattress, like an alarm clock.

Synthetic Mattresses and Mildew

As if the disturbance of the electro-magnetic fields and the chemicals in mattresses were not enough, synthetic mattress materials also can easily form mildew as excess moisture is absorbed and often does not dry quickly enough to get rid of the moisture before the mildew forms.  If the mildew is mild, like it often is, you may sleep next to this mildew without knowing it, but it is still harmful to your immune system.

Synthetic foam mattresses, like the memory foam, are all the rage today, and they are touted as helping people to get a better night's sleep.  However, they not only off-gas toxic chemicals, but they also provide a non-breathing surface, which causes overheating and moisture build-up and a less than ideal sleeping experience.

Natural Mattresses

Natural Latex / Rubber

Even natural latex mattresses, made with the sap of the rubber tree, don't breathe as well as wool and can cause you to overheat and feel the moisture buildup.  In addition, "natural" latex can contain vulcanization chemicals, including sulfur and ammonia, which can be harmful.   The real truth is that "natural" latex mattresses cannot be made without some of these additives.  Most natural rubber is only 97% pure, and the other 3% are solvents used in the manufacturing process.  In the Dunlop process, they add sodium silico fluoride.

One natural bed retailer told me:  "All natural rubber to be made into latex has something in it.  We have 99% rubber, 98% rubber, 97% rubber and 93% rubber and we call all of those 100% natural rubber latex."  So there you have it, 100% natural rubber latex that is not 100% pure.  Hmm, doesn't sound 100% natural to me.  Let the buyer beware.

That said, many people feel their natural latex mattress is so comfortable, they would never give it up!  If a natural latex mattress enables you to get a good night’s sleep, it is infinitely better than sleeping on a synthetic latex or conventional “memory foam” bed, which has numerous carcinigenic chemicals.  Just try to find a latex mattress that is as natural as possible, and be aware that any mattress that is at least partially made with natural rubber can be called a "natural" latex mattress, even if 90% of the rubber used is synthetic!

Natural or Organic Cotton Mattresses

Most organic cotton mattresses use coils or latex in the middle, because the cotton compresses so much as to make the surface too hard without it.  Cotton also has a low resistance level to mildew, since it tends to absorb water, and dust mites, and this can also cause health problems and keep you from having a good nights rest over time.  If your mattress has "natural" (not certified organic) cotton, they probably did not use chemicals in the processing, but there are most certainly still pesticide, herbicide and defoliant chemical residues left over that you may be breathing in all night long.  Cotton is one of the most heavily sprayed crops there is, in fact, it is estimated that cotton crops use 25% of all pesticides used in the US.

If you are thinking about getting a cotton bed with springs in it, you really owe it to yourself to spend a little more to make sure that it is organic.  The Royal-Pedic line is probably more comfortable than most.  Lifekind’s mattresses are probably more pure than most.

There is, however, another alternative that has helped many people to finally get a good nights rest without chemical exposure:  The Wool Mattress by Shepherd's Dream.


___________________________________________________


...all welcome to health and industry canada !

...canada is a healthy country, in many things and in many things not !

...I AM NO SALE PERSON but all that makes sense is
ALPACA WOOL OR SHEEP WOOL !
http://www.shepherdsdream.com/p-26-all-natural-4-wool-mattress.aspx

...and anything with some kind of chemicals, pesticides, ripeners, preservatives or bed bug insecticides,
is really not for you ! they just have not told you so !

...so the story of the black sheep is true !  sheep are cleaner animals in what
they eat than "goats"...!
.
.
.






Thursday, August 23, 2012

Alek Boyd: Cangrejo electoral en Venezuela























Alek Boyd: Cangrejo electoral en Venezuela

"The electoral "Crab" = "unsolved_fraud_crime" of Chavez and Venezuela !

 DID I SAY A LIE ? DID I OFFEND SOMEBODY OR ANY COUNTRY GOVERNMENT ? NO ! THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH !
IT IS UP TO YOU TO KNOW HOW TO DO THINGS CORRECTLY OR MAKE US ALL PUT UP WITH THE LIE ! AND YOU TAKE THE CRITICISM !
http://abiteinthechunk.blogspot.ca/2012/08/alek-boyd-cangrejo-electoral-en.html

http://alekboyd.blogspot.ca/2012/08/cangrejo-electoral-venezuela.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+AlekBoyd+%28Alek+Boyd%29



...no thrid party or presence of the opposition audit examination of the electronic electoral system has been done ! Only the Government CNE has done audits !
...nobody has checked the database of registered electors...!

...because sometimes, the population knows what they want and whom ! and not always the current governance is what is better !

THE BIGGEST KNOWN FORCE ON THE EARTH TO DEAL WITH: The English country "peasants" and the World poor ! They could stop the World ! But no ! They have never ever really done anything for themselves ! HOW DO YOU UNITE THEM ? Jesus said somehow, they will be united with me ! 

WE HAVE more than 30million in the USA, and at least 3million to 8million in Canada ! Jesus said, and I say to make it sound similarly effective: "Come and follow me, and you will never be peasants again...!" [Was that true or false ? Then if you know the answer ans true results: you will have the brains to know what to do !]

There is a secret database of followers of pure logic and your freedom for ever ! YOU make it be in your mind ! Soon we can make it "public" ! "Then" our players will be paced were they need to be: everywhere !
.
.
. 

Sunday, August 19, 2012

...believe me: "the needle and the 'hay' stack"...!


























THE STORY/FABLE OF THE CHINESE AND THE NEEDLE IN THE "HAY" STACK

el cuento del chino y la aguja en el pajar !
que quelel ud. encontrar su voto ?
pol favol il["goto - if - then"] al base de dato del CNE !
ayi estal su boto secleto !
asi ud velifical si pude habel flaude{froid}...!
yo si cleel en botar[botas-booting]...!
mucho gusto:
yo sel el chino que se comio el cuento de la aguja ["ACCUPUNTURA"] en el pajal...!
el chino jolgito !

------------------------------------------------------

thei stoly of the chinese and the needle in the hay staackk !
guat du yu vant tou find yu bote ?
ples gou tu["goto - if - then"] data baise of CNE !
their yu vil fin yu voute seclet !
sou yu velifi iff their kan bei "flaudd{froid}" ...!
ai du belibe inn boting[boots-booting]...!
hou arei yu, nize :
ai ann thei chinezee tat eate thei stoly of thei "needle/pinn[accupuncturee]"
inn thei hay stacaackkk !
thei chineesee geolgitou !

-------------------------------------------------------

the story of the chinese and the needle in the hay stack !
you want to find your vote ?
please goto["goto - if - then"] the database at the CNE !
there you will find your secret vote !
so you will be able to verify if there[their] has been any fraud !
i do believe in voting [booting-boots]...!
how are you ? very nice :
i[ai] am the chinese that swallowed whole the story of the
"needle/pinn[accupuncturee]" in the hay stack...!
the chinese jorgito/georgito !
.
.
.


...World logic and justice progresses...!















Pussy Riot verdict draws worldwide condemnation

http://article.wn.com/view/2012/08/18/Pussy_Riot_verdict_draws_worldwide_condemnation/
http://www.dw.de/dw/article/0,,16176246,00.html
[[["...The two-year prison sentence for Russian punk band Pussy Riot has drawn worldwide condemnation. Politicians and human rights activists see the verdict as being politically motivated and way too harsh.

Author Boris Akunin had a biting metaphor to describe the consequences of the Friday indictment of Russian punk rock band Pussy Riot.

"The iceberg [Russian President] Vladimir Putin sits on is now melting faster," he wrote.

By iceberg, Akunin was apparently referring to the Russian people's support of Putin. On Friday (17.08.2012), the author joined several hundred others at Khamovniki district court in Moscow to protest the body's ruling. The process has also received widespread condemnation outside Russia.

Pussy Riot inside Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Savior (Photo: InterTass)

In their song, the band asks the Virgin Mary to "drive out Putin"

The court sentenced Maria Alyokhina, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Yekaterina Samutsevich to two years in prison on charges of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred.

The defendants performed an anti-Putin song inside Moscow's Christ the Savior Cathedral in February. They jumped and danced in front of the altar in scenes filmed by a fellow member of Pussy Riot and later edited for a now-famous video clip. In their song, the group asks the Virgin Mary to "drive out Putin."

International outrage

Lyudmila Alexeyeva, head of the Moscow Helsinki Group strongly condemned the verdict.

"This is a very severe ruling because the girls are not guilty of anything," she said.

Alexeyeva also called the ruling stupid, saying it would damage the already tarnished image of the Russian government and Orthodox Church.

The verdict drew similar condemnation from Amnesty International, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the European Commission.

German politicians weigh in

The ruling also made waves in Germany. "This is definitely a disproportionate sentence," German Human Rights Commissioner Markus Löning told DW. "The fairness of the trial could also be called into question."

He added the verdict showed "the bitter truth" that "freedom of expression is not currently guaranteed in Russia."

Löning appealed to Putin to set an example and free the three women. "Two of them have small children," he said. "They should be with their families, not in prison."

Lyudmila Alekseyeva (Photo RIA Novosti)

Lyudmila Alexeyeva is a Russian civil rights legend

German Christian Democrat (CDU) parliamentarian Andreas Schockenhoff said the verdict sets a dangerous precedent.

"It sends a signal to Russian society," he said, that "whoever criticizes the regime, instead of subordinating his will to it, will be viewed not as a partner but a threat that must be combated."

Schockenhoff is co-chair of the ruling Christian Democrat and Christian Social Union alliance in Germany's lower house of parliament, the Bundestag. He is also coordinator for German-Russian cooperation at the German Foreign Ministry.

German opposition parties also criticized the Pussy Riot verdict. Social Democrat Francis Thönnes told DW Russia was a long way from western standards of justice.

"After an unfair trial, it is an inappropriate verdict," he said. "The penalty is disproportionate to the actual situation."

'Soviet reflexes'

Experts including Eberhard Schneider of the EU-Russia center in Brussels think the Pussy Riot verdict has a political basis. He said their prison sentences shows how much pressure protests have put on the Kremlin in recent months. For more than six months, protesters have demonstrated against Putin and his system.

Andreas Schockenhoff (Photo: Hannibal dpa)

Schockenhoff sees the trial as setting a precedent

Schneider thinks the Kremlin exerted its influence over the court that tried the Pussy Riot members. He pointed to Putin's remarks on the case. The Russian leader previously said the women should not be too severely punished, and the judge indeed refrained from giving them the maximum seven-year sentence.

However, Schneider said the case shows "reflexes from the Soviet system, in which there is no real separation between the executive and judicial branches of government" were still in effect.

Reactions to the verdict were mixed in Russia itself. While the opposition and human rights activists made sharp criticism, the pro-Kremlin United Russia party voiced its approval. Parliamentarian Alexei Tschesnakov said the verdict was appropriate and would deter acts similar to Pussy Riot's. Prior to the ruling, the Russian Orthodox Church for its part called on the state to show "grace within the law."..."
]]]



...regressive mentalities, and repressive ones, seem to do historic loop backs, if we study History a bit ...! The Worst Religious Inquisitionists of the Civilized World has been as always the Swiss Guard protected VATICAN-CATHOLIC CHURCH...!

...and forgive me: BUT I DO NOT KNOW HOW WE PROGRESSED TO THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, AND ESCAPED THE INQUISITION, AND DEVELOPED TO HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THE GENEVA WAR TIME RIGHTS...!

.

.
.








Saturday, August 18, 2012

Why Republicans Abhor the New Healthcare Add


 








Romney no dude nor jude !

Why Republicans Abhor the New Healthcare Add

http://abiteinthechunk.blogspot.ca/2012/08/why-republicans-abhor-new-healthcare-add.html

[["... "No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable." -Adam Smith

The Republicans and ultra-conservatives that were up in arms over the recent Cancer Add, which linked presidential hopeful Mitt Romney as a possible cause for the death of a laid-off steelworker's wife from cancer, is another example of a lack of ethical and consequential thinking. Thinking involves basic intellectual skills, but these skills can be used to serve two incompatible ends: self-centeredness or empathetic and fair-mindedness.(1) Whereas empathetic and fair-minded thinking tries to correct the causes of behaviors and actions that might harm or injure others, self-centered thinking does not. Neither does self-centered thinking understand the "web of causation."

The Healthcare Add being ridiculed and derided features Joe Soptic, who lost his job and health benefits as a result of Romney's Bain Capital closing a GST Steel plant. Without adequate healthcare insurance and due to a lack of income, including Romney's Bain Capital de-funding GST Steel worker's pensions, his wife did not visit a doctor for years. When she finally decided to see a doctor, due to pneumonia, she was diagnosed with stage-4 lung cancer. Again, and due to a lack of healthcare, she was placed in a county hospital where she soon died. The add ends with Soptic saying, "That probably wouldn't have happened if Bain kept its promise and I was allowed to keep our health insurance."

Empathetic and fair-minded thinkers use thinking in an ethically responsible manner. They work to understand and appreciate other peoples viewpoints and situations. Not only are they willing to listen to others, but they are able to empathize, or to identify with and feel and, to a certain extent, understand and imagine another persons difficulties and sufferings. Selfish and socio-, politico-centric thinkers are unable to sense the hardships and pains of others. They are professionals in the art of self-denial and have mastered the ability to twist information and evidence to support their own selfish interests. They try to block-out contradictory arguments while blaming or demonizing those who disagree..."]]

... I am convinced that Romney, and whoever thinks in their "sane" minds that USA is an advanced "humanitarian" country without the new medical health care done by the Democrats, must be delirious and have a very bad memory !

...COULD CANADA be the same as to "peasants", and "human rights"...?  :
[[[[Empathetic and fair-minded thinkers use thinking in an ethically responsible manner. They work to understand and appreciate other peoples viewpoints and situations. Not only are they willing to listen to others, but they are able to empathize, or to identify with and feel and, to a certain extent, understand and imagine another persons difficulties and sufferings. Selfish and socio-, politico-centric thinkers are unable to sense the hardships and pains of others. They are professionals in the art of self-denial and have mastered the ability to twist information and evidence to support their own selfish interests. They try to block-out contradictory arguments while blaming or demonizing those who disagree]]]]. 

...Because I am supposed to be some "listed" narcissist maniac of some sort...! With failed logic as to their logic ! Or lets be more practical: my logic as to " {'Heaven'} on Earth" is "impractical"...!


...again, i do not believe in Capitalism, as the recent "government bailouts" to Banks, etc. prove...! that some can be bailed and helped by government, but peasants cannot have a government loan/rental to pay a "dignity own abode"...! english governments have not achieved nothing in the 60 years of Queen E2, and since a few milenia, as to "peasants"...! meaning their "logic" is screwed up somehow ! as to the black slavery , they were happier as they had work...! today's peasants are mostly "rusting" with no work or activities...!

.
.
.

Friday, August 17, 2012

...to help and protect ! not to coerce and repress...!










Canadians trust in what is their "repressive-cohersive-communist" no rights public control, is in jeopardy !
And I did not say it: I have smelt it, and at very close, or too close touch !
One sat on me for mental health to oblige me to a "injection", because I negated myself, and a nurse did not like me answering back at her: and telling her to take what she was giving me obliged !
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/index.htm

Distrust of the RCMP's senior managers by rank-and-file members is widening by "leaps and bounds," according to a letter sent recently by a 39-year veteran of the RCMP in British Columbia to his member of Parliament.

The letter, obtained by Postmedia News, is the latest salvo against RCMP leadership by disgruntled officers, who say their concerns are not being addressed.

Cpl. Loren Chaplin writes that the force "needs to be burnt to the ground, metaphorically speaking, and either resurrected from the ashes with clear new focus and direction ... or it needs to be buried once and for all as having outlived its intended purpose."

Read more: http://www.canada.com/news/Corporal+critical+letter+latest+salvo+against+RCMP+management/7101944/story.html#ixzz23rjmWM98



...you do not pay back for your shit to me...!

...you do not do your shit to me ! and you still are to help and protect...!
.
.
.

...kasparov, in canada you would be detained too ! and probably they would try to send you to mental health detention ! as in prison you would have more rights !

















Garry Kasparov Arrested and Beaten by Police
August 17th, 2012 • Related • Filed Under

Garry Kasparov arrested and beaten by police outside of Pussy Riot courthouse
as guilty verdict arrives for the trio inside

    Inside the courtroom, the judge declared the three young women guilty of “hooliganism” with “religious hatred” for political protest inside a Moscow cathedral. They have been sentenced to two years in prison.
    Kasparov was not protesting; he was outside speaking with journalists when police pushed through to seize him. Kasparov was pushed roughly into police van, where he was struck and choked. He is currently being held at police station as police await orders.
    In an even more absurd turn of events, police accused Kasparov of biting an officer’s finger, which Kasparov dismissed as “complete garbage,” adding: “How much strength do you need to bite someone’s hand through to the bone anyway? It would at least damage a couple of teeth, but mine are all fine.”

http://www.theotherrussia.org/2012/08/17/garry-kasparov-arrested-and-beaten-by-police/

Moscow – August 17, 2012 (1400 GMT)
Unprecedented crowds of supporters and journalists surrounded the Moscow courthouse where the female Russian punk trio Pussy Riot were sentenced today. The three women staged an anti‐Putin protest at the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in February and have been jailed since March. Their persecution has drawn tremendous public attention and support from human rights organizations and artists around the world. They were declared guilty and sentenced to two years in prison. Garry Kasparov, former world chess champion and a long‐time Russian pro‐democracy leader who chairs the United Civil Front in Russia and the US‐based Human Rights Foundation, was outside the courthouse speaking to Radio Svoboda journalists when police pushed through to seize him. The 49‐year‐old Kasparov insisted he was not protesting but the police grabbed him and violently dragged him into a police van, where he was further physically assaulted by the police, as documented by a photographer. PHOTOS (see below): http://bit.ly/R6tzMz ~ http://bit.ly/S0VPjn
When reached by telephone at a nearby police station, the battered Kasparov stated, “this is the perfect Kremlin reply to those who talked about Russian liberalism under Putin or who believed in an acquittal for Pussy Riot or Putin’s talk about leniency.” Kasparov’s fate is uncertain. An estimated 50 people have been arrested outside the courthouse so far.
Contact Mig Greengard at +1 917.495.9460 or mgreengard@theotherrussia.org. Updates are being posted at http://www.kasparov.ru, https://www.facebook.com/pages/Garry‐Kasparov/243791258306 and https://twitter.com/Kasparov63


...gary kasparov, believe it or not, but Canada has many issues you would be surprised about of "human rights degradations and violations", plus draconianisms !

...bigger companies break and make peasants out of smaller companies, smaller farmers are broken by bigger ones and made peasants, and in the cities, a working family might lose all sustanance and become peasants, and peasants are in as bad living as in Russia !

...do you want to find out of no rights and torture in "Canada mental health detentions" over many issues, including ones like yours ?
.
.
.




Russian band Pussy Riot face years in jail pending Friday verdict - IFEX




Russian band Pussy Riot face years in jail pending Friday verdict - IFEX

 This Friday, 17 August 2012, a verdict will be handed down in the trial against members of Pussy Riot, a Russian punk group charged with hooliganism after performing their "punk prayer" in a Moscow church, criticising the Russian Orthodox Church's endorsement of President Putin. If convicted, three members, Maria Alyokhina, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, and Yekaterina Samusevch face three years in jail. They have been held in pre-trial detention since March 2012.

Take action now to influence Friday's verdict, and help keep members of Pussy Riot out of jail!

Here are 3 things you can do:

1. Sign this Amnesty International petition calling on the Russian authorities to drop all charges and release detained members of Pussy Riot.

2. Take part in the Pussy Riot Global Day, Friday 17 August. For information about events in your city visit http://www.freepussyriot.org/.

3. Send a personal message to President Putin urging him to respect freedom of expression and to immediately and unconditionally release Maria Alekhina, Ekaterina Samutsevich and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova. Be sure to copy the Russian ambassador in your own country. The list is on line here.

Pussy Riot is an anonymous Russian feminist performance art group formed in October 2011. Through a series of peaceful performances in highly visible places, the group has given voice to basic rights under threat in Russia today, expressing the values and principles of gender equality, democracy and freedom of expression contained in the Russian constitution and other international instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the CEDAW Convention.

Detained members of the art group Pussy Riot are:


  • Maria Alekhina, 24. Poet and Student at the Institute of Journalism and Creative writing. Mother of 5-year-old boy.
  • Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 23. Visual Artist and 4th year Philosophy Student. Mother of 4-year-old girl.
  • Ekaterina Samutsevich, 29. Visual Artist, degree from The Alexander Rodchenko School of Photography and Multimedia, Moscow.

    On 21 February, four members of Pussy Riot entered the Christ the Saviour Cathedral in Moscow, wearing brightly coloured outfits and balaclavas masking their faces. For a few minutes they danced in front of the altar, singing their “punk prayer” before being removed from the building.

    One week after the performance, an edited video of Pussy Riot performing, both in the church and elsewhere, appeared on Youtube, and a week after that the police were instructed to arrest the group's known members.

    Maria Alyokhina, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Ekaterina Samutsevich were arrested and charged with “hooliganism” under Article 213 of the Russian Criminal Code, which carries a maximum seven-year jail term, although the prosecutor has called for a three year sentence.

    The group says on their website, "The intention of the performance was to draw attention to the special relationship between President Putin and the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church."

    Since March 4th, the women have sat in pre-trial detention, refused bail due to what the authorities termed as "fear for the women's safety."

    PEN International published a translation of their "punk prayer" Punk Moleben and its context.

    For recent news, see:
    Russia: Prosecutor seeks three years sentence for members of Pussy Riot (Freemuse)
    Russia: Freemuse calls for free and fair trial for Pussy Riot - with video feeds from the courtroom
    God is judging Pussy Riot, says Russian church leader (The Guardian, UK)
    Pussy Riot on Putin, 'punk prayers' and superheroes - video interview (The Guardian)



  • ...be it known that ORTHODOX "JEWS", Academia Theology, Academia Biology Evolution, R.C.M.P Police of Canada, Catholic Church, Anglicans, etc..., have declared a war on my person and Book of Pure Logic !

    ...draconian RUSSIA in action , and soon Canada !
    .
    .
    .

    Thursday, August 16, 2012

    ...i am a new canadian dissident...!


















    if i were a canadian peasant i would be in nearly as bad condition as in the banana republic of venezuela i used to live in !

    1,000$ no government support molar lost !

    no support of government for my necessary naturist products-food and vitamins !

    and listed as a "problem" and with a "mental problem" in the POLICE R.C.M.P database for life ! their panacea of degradation and destruction !

    i have similar or worse neighbor and social problems, made by them and not me, as venezuela !

    i apparently do not have any willful judiciary or available lawyers, similar to the venezuela of chavez !

    and no real medical hospital hope of help, as venezuela !

    the only difference is that i found some feminine help here, but as to my finances: Canada set me back to cero !

    I THOUGHT I HAD BEEN ABUSED IN VENEZUELA AND HAD NO REAL RIGHTS ! Well nooo ! Canada degraded and took my persona rights away from me 4 times over "kindergarden stupid issues" ! , and tortured me every time, for 3 weeks ! And menaced me on house arrest and followup on torture !  THIS SOUNDS TO ME LIKE: China, Burma, or Cuba ! To not mention Russia or some other crazy country !

    WELCOME IMMIGRANTS TO Canada ! They love you and you will soon find out !


    .
    .
    .

    ...a 01 august 2012 worst known document of "inquisition" in Canada !







     email 16 aug 2012- canada's draconian for all use "mental health act" ! i am sure they have all gone mental ! THIS IS COMMUNIST REPRESSION and not freedom !


    pm@pm.gc.ca; info@parl.gc.ca; premier@gov.bc.ca; mcu@justice.gc.ca
    InfoDesk@ohchr.org; civilsociety@ohchr.org; enable@un.org



    MODERN INQUISITION and involuntary detentions for anything at up to now 1 month from 14 days
    This is draconian ! You can be bailed at 48hrs and a lawyer normally !
    http://www.cba.org/bc/public_media/health/425.aspx ; http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/00_96288_01

    If you think this is a normal way to treat humans ? You must have a mental problem yourself !

    PLEASE DO SOMETHING AGAINST CANADA AND DRACONIAN INQUISITION FOR ANYTHING MEAGER ! AGAINST PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICATION TORTURE AND INVOLUNTARY DETENTIONS WITH BIASED ONE PERSON DECISIONS ! NO LAWYER ASSISTANCE !
    THIS IS THE OPEN DOOR TO ANCIENT TIMES TO DO ANYTHING AGAINST SOMEBODY ELSE AND LEGALLY !

    A PRISONER OF WAR IS TREATED BETTER AND HAS MORE RIGHTS !

    THEY BELIEVE THE "ILLEGAL" METHODS ARE JUSTIFIED BY THE STATISTICAL RESULTS AT SUCH A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION COST !

    UNDER THE AMOUNT OF REPIRADOL[RESPIRODAL], ETC. [torture medication-i do not use]. GIVEN I WOULD NOT MAKE IT NOW OUT NORMALLY AFTER 14 DAYS WHICH IS INCREMENTED TO 1 MONTH. MUCH LESS REACH A HEARING. AS THEY MENACED TO INCREASE DOSAGE IF REQUESTED A HEARING !

    THIS IS DRACONIAN CANADA WORSE THAT CUBA-GUANTANAMO ! CONSIDERED TO BE NORMAL ! Never do results justify the means ! NEVER ! Even in War there are rules !

    They have given up their  personas, and legal rights, and by the time you get any legal hearing, you may as well have not !

    A detention of any nature requires the assessment of more than one person, and a lawyer present ! THEY HAVE FORGOTTEN ANYTHING NORMAL !

    PLEASE REFER TO THE WORST logical inquisition document ever known bellow: [do you guys have any common sense of what you are doing and what human rights are?]


    _____________________________________________

    QR Code LinkWhat is a QR Code
    Copyright (c) Queen's Printer,
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada    IMPORTANT INFORMATION
    Qp Date
    Mental Health Act
    [RSBC 1996] CHAPTER 288

    Contents
    Part 1 — Interpretation
         1     Definitions
    Part 2 — Administration
         2     Establishment of facilities and services
         3     Designation of mental health facilities
         4     Transfer of facilities
         5     Licensing of private mental health facilities
         6     Persons entitled to service
         7     Repealed
         8     Powers and duties of directors
         9     Charges for care and treatment
         10     Assessment committee
         11     Guardians and committees
         12     Admissions from penitentiaries
         13     Reciprocal arrangements with other provinces
         14     Reciprocal arrangements with Canada
         15     Transportation of patients
         16     Protection from liability for certain actions
         17     Offence
    Part 3 — Admission and Detention of Patients
         18     When persons are not to be admitted
         19     Admission of female person
         20     Voluntary admissions
         21     Review panel for person under 16 years of age
         22     Involuntary admissions
         23     Duration of detention
         24     Review of detention
         24.1     Board and review panels
         24.2     Application of Administrative Tribunals Act
         24.3     Power to compel witnesses and order disclosure
         25     Hearing by review panel
         25.1     Amendment to final decision
         26–27     Repealed
         28     Emergency procedures
         29     Prisoners and youth custody centre inmates
         30     Detention under Criminal Code
         31     Deemed consent to treatment and request for a second opinion
         32     Direction and discipline of patients
         33     Application to court for discharge
         34     Notice to involuntary patient
         34.1     Notice to patient under 16 years of age
         34.2     Advice to near relative
         35     Transfers
         36     Discharge
         37     Leave
         38     Approved homes
         39     Authority to detain continues despite leave or transfer
         40     Exception to rules about leave and approved homes
         41     Unauthorized absences
         42     Transfer from another province
    Part 4 — Regulations
         43     Power to make regulations
    Schedule

    Part 1 — Interpretation
    Definitions

    1  In this Act:

    "approved home" means a home selected and approved under the regulations made under this Act;

    "chair" means the chair appointed under section 24.1 (1) (a);

    "court" means the Supreme Court;

    "designated facility" means a Provincial mental health facility, psychiatric unit or observation unit;

    "director" means a person appointed under the regulations to be in charge of a designated facility and includes a person authorized by a director to exercise a power or carry out a duty conferred or imposed on the director under this Act or the Patients Property Act;

    "near relative" means a grandparent, parent, child, spouse, sibling, half sibling, friend, caregiver or companion designated by a patient and includes the legal guardian of a minor and a representative under an agreement made under the Representation Agreement Act and a committee having custody of the person of a patient under the Patients Property Act;

    "observation unit" means a public hospital or a part of it designated by the minister as an observation unit;

    "parent" includes the spouse of a parent of a person with a mental disorder;

    "patient" means a person who, under this Act,

    (a) is receiving care, supervision, treatment, maintenance or rehabilitation, or

    (b) is received, detained or taken charge of as a person with a mental disorder or as apparently a person with a mental disorder;

    "person with a mental disorder" means a person who has a disorder of the mind that requires treatment and seriously impairs the person's ability

    (a) to react appropriately to the person's environment, or

    (b) to associate with others;

    "physician" means a medical practitioner;

    "private mental hospital" means an establishment licensed under section 5;

    "Provincial mental health facility" means a Provincial mental health facility designated under this Act;

    "psychiatric unit" means a public hospital or a part of it designated by the minister as a psychiatric unit;

    "public hospital" means an institution designated as a hospital under section 1 of the Hospital Act;

    "resident of British Columbia" means a person who has resided in British Columbia for a period determined by the Lieutenant Governor in Council;

    "review panel" means a review panel established under section 24.1 (2);

    "society" means a society incorporated or registered under the Society Act to establish or operate facilities or services designed for the mental welfare of residents of British Columbia;

    "treatment" means safe and effective psychiatric treatment and includes any procedure necessarily related to the provision of psychiatric treatment.

    Part 2 — Administration
    Establishment of facilities and services

    2  The Lieutenant Governor in Council may establish and maintain facilities and services for the examination, diagnosis and treatment of persons with a mental disorder and the rehabilitation of patients and for that purpose may, by order, authorize the minister, for the government, to acquire, manage and operate property.
    Designation of mental health facilities

    3  (1) The minister may designate a building or premises as a Provincial mental health facility.

    (2) The minister may designate a public hospital or a part of it, not being a Provincial mental health facility, as an observation unit or a psychiatric unit.
    Transfer of facilities

    4  (1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may by order transfer a Provincial mental health facility or service or a part of it to a society.

    (2) An order under subsection (1) must designate the following:

    (a) the conditions of the transfer of the property that constitutes the Provincial mental health facility or service or part of it;

    (b) the number of persons who are to be appointed to the board of management of the society by the Lieutenant Governor in Council;

    (c) the requirements of inspection.

    (3) An order under subsection (1) must give any necessary direction for the transfer of officers and employees who are public servants under the Public Service Act from the Provincial mental health facility to the society.

    (4) An order under subsection (1) may direct that, despite the transfer, the officers and employees continue in the public service of British Columbia.
    Licensing of private mental health facilities

    5  (1) On application, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may license as a private mental health facility

    (a) any private hospital licensed under the Hospital Act, and

    (b) any community care facility licensed under the Community Care and Assisted Living Act.

    (2) A person must not receive a person with a mental disorder into or cause or permit a person with a mental disorder to remain in a private house for gain or payment, unless the house is licensed under subsection (1).
    Persons entitled to service

    6  Subject to sections 12 and 18, every resident of British Columbia is entitled to receive service and accommodation in the facilities provided under this Act in accordance with this Act and its regulations.
    Repealed

    7  [Repealed 1997-23-23.]
    Powers and duties of directors

    8  A director must ensure

    (a) that each patient admitted to the designated facility is provided with professional service, care and treatment appropriate to the patient's condition and appropriate to the function of the designated facility and, for those purposes, a director may sign consent to treatment forms for a patient detained under section 22, 28, 29, 30 or 42,

    (b) that standards appropriate to the function of the designated facility are established and maintained, and

    (c) if in charge of a Provincial mental health facility, that the orders and directives of the minister are observed and performed.
    Charges for care and treatment

    9  (1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may prescribe daily charges for care, treatment and maintenance provided in a Provincial mental health facility.

    (2) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may by regulation exempt a class of patient from the prescribed daily charges.
    Assessment committee

    10  (1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may appoint an assessment committee, consisting of 3 members, who hold office during pleasure and without remuneration.

    (2) The assessment committee may prospectively or retrospectively reduce or cancel charges for the care, treatment and maintenance of a patient.
    Guardians and committees

    11  (1) A guardian, committee or other person liable for payment for a patient's care, treatment or maintenance must, on demand from the director of a Provincial mental health facility in which the patient is or has been receiving care, treatment or maintenance, make payments to the director in accordance with the rates set under this Act.

    (2) The director may demand from a guardian, committee or other person liable to pay for a patient's care, treatment or maintenance any sum due at any time and may in default of payment sue on behalf of the government for the recovery of the sum in a court of competent jurisdiction.

    (3) An action under this section must be taken in the name of the director.
    Admissions from penitentiaries

    12  The director of every Provincial mental health facility must ensure that no person with a mental disorder is admitted into any Provincial mental health facility from a penitentiary, prison, jail, reformatory or institution under the jurisdiction and administration of Canada unless the government of Canada, by or through an officer having authority to act on its behalf, undertakes to pay all charges for care, treatment and maintenance of that person.
    Reciprocal arrangements with other provinces

    13  With the approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, the minister may, on behalf of the government, enter into or cancel a reciprocal arrangement with the government of any other province of Canada for the assumption of all or part of the charges incurred by a resident of one province hospitalized in a public mental hospital or provincial mental health facility in another.
    Reciprocal arrangements with Canada

    14  The Lieutenant Governor in Council may, on behalf of the government, enter into or cancel an agreement with Canada for the sharing of costs of care and treatment of persons with a mental disorder.
    Transportation of patients

    15  A person who is being transported to a designated facility for admission and who is not detained or being transported under the Criminal Code or under section 29 must be kept separate from any person who is detained or being transported under the Criminal Code or under section 29.
    Protection from liability for certain actions

    16  A person is not liable in damages as the result of doing any of the following in good faith and with reasonable care:

    (a) making an application or laying an information;

    (b) requesting that a person be admitted to, or admitted to and detained in, a designated facility;

    (b.1) if the person is the director, admitting a patient to the designated facility under section 20 (1) (a) (ii) on the basis of a physician's opinion or continuing the admission and treatment of the patient on the basis of a report made under section 20 (4);

    (b.2) if the person is the director, admitting a patient to the designated facility and detaining the patient on the authority of a medical certificate or a warrant or report or determination made under section 24 or 25;

    (b.3) if the person is the director, authorizing treatment or signing a consent to treatment form;

    (c) signing a medical certificate or making a report if the person is a physician;

    (d) making an order if the person is a justice of the court;

    (e) issuing a warrant if the person is a judge of the Provincial Court, a justice of the peace or a director;

    (f) apprehending, transporting or taking charge of a person on the authority of

    (i)  a medical certificate, or

    (ii)  if a peace officer, a warrant;

    (f.1) if a police officer or constable, apprehending a person under section 28 (1);

    (g) [Repealed 2004-45-116.]

    (h) if a director, releasing a patient under section 37, transferring or accepting the transfer of a patient under section 35 or 38 or recalling a patient under section 39 in a manner not contrary to the regulations;

    (i) providing in a manner not contrary to the regulations the care, supervision, treatment, maintenance or rehabilitation of a patient on leave or transferred to an approved home under section 37 or 38.
    Offence

    17  (1) A person commits an offence punishable under the Offence Act who

    (a) assists a patient to leave or to attempt to leave a designated facility without proper authority,

    (b) does or omits to do an act to assist a patient in leaving or attempting to leave a designated facility without proper authority, or

    (c) incites or counsels a patient to leave a designated facility without proper authority.

    (2) A person employed in a designated facility or a private mental hospital, or any other person having charge of a patient, who ill treats, assaults or wilfully neglects a patient commits an offence punishable under the Offence Act.

    Part 3 — Admission and Detention of Patients
    When persons are not to be admitted

    18  Despite anything in this Act, a director or person who has authority to admit persons to a Provincial mental health facility must not admit a person to a Provincial mental health facility if

    (a) suitable accommodation is not available within the Provincial mental health facility for the care, treatment and maintenance of the patient, or

    (b) in the opinion of the director or person who has authority to admit persons to the Provincial mental health facility, the person is not a person with a mental disorder or is a person who, because of the nature of his or her mental disorder, could not be cared for or treated appropriately in the facility.
    Admission of female person

    19  The person who requests or applies for the admission of a female person to a Provincial mental health facility must arrange for her to be accompanied by a near relative or a female person between the time of the request or application and her admission to a Provincial mental health facility.
    Voluntary admissions

    20  (1) A director may admit any person to the designated facility

    (a) if the person

    (i)  has reached 16 years of age and requests admission, or

    (ii)  is under 16 years of age and a parent or guardian of the person requests that the person be admitted, and

    (b) if the director is satisfied that the person has been examined by a physician who is of the opinion that the person is a person with a mental disorder.

    (2) A patient admitted under this section who is under 16 years of age must, unless discharged from the designated facility, be examined at the following times by a physician authorized for the purpose by the director:

    (a) within each of the first 2 months following the date the patient was admitted;

    (b) within 3 months of the second examination required by paragraph (a);

    (c) within 6 months of the examination required by paragraph (b);

    (d) within each successive 6 month period following the examination required by paragraph (c).

    (3) If the physician who examines a patient under subsection (2) is of the opinion that the patient is not a person with a mental disorder, the director must discharge that patient.

    (4) If the physician who examines a patient under subsection (2) is of the opinion that the patient is a person with a mental disorder, the physician must record a written report of the examination and include in it the reasons for the opinion.

    (5) A nurse in charge of a ward in a designated facility must

    (a) ensure that each patient in the ward who was admitted under this section is enabled to communicate without delay to the director any desire that the patient may form to leave the designated facility, and

    (b) on learning that a patient in the ward who was admitted under this section desires to leave the designated facility, promptly notify the director of that desire.

    (6) A patient admitted under this section must be discharged by the director

    (a) if the patient has reached 16 years of age and the director is notified in any manner that the patient desires to be discharged,

    (b) if the patient is under 16 years of age and the director is notified in any manner that a parent or guardian requests that the patient be discharged, or

    (c) if the patient is under 16 years of age and the director is notified by a physician, authorized by the director for the purpose of this section, that the patient has been examined by the physician and found not to be a person with a mental disorder.

    (7) Subsections (5) and (6) do not apply if the requirements for detention of the patient under section 22 (1) have been fulfilled.

    (8) A person who has reached 16 years of age and who has been admitted to a designated facility has, despite any rule of law relating to minors, the capacity to make the request and to make an agreement for payment for maintenance and treatment in the designated facility and to authorize the person's treatment in the designated facility.
    Review panel for person under 16 years of age

    21  (1) If a patient admitted to a designated facility under section 20 (1) (a) (ii) desires to leave the facility and is under 16 years of age, section 25 applies as though the patient had been admitted under section 22 if

    (a) the patient requests the discharge, and

    (b) no person entitled to apply under section 20 (1) (a) (ii) for the patient's admission requests the discharge under section 20 (6) (b).

    (2) For the purposes of subsection (1) (b), the director must discharge the patient if the patient is found not to be a person with a mental disorder.
    Involuntary admissions

    22  (1) The director of a designated facility may admit a person to the designated facility and detain the person for up to 48 hours for examination and treatment on receiving one medical certificate respecting the person completed by a physician in accordance with subsections (3) and (4).

    (2) On receipt by the director of a second medical certificate completed by another physician in accordance with subsections (3) and (5) respecting the patient admitted under subsection (1), the detention and treatment of that patient may be continued beyond the 48 hour period referred to in subsection (1).

    (3) Each medical certificate under this section must be completed by a physician who has examined the person to be admitted, or the patient admitted, under subsection (1) and must set out

    (a) a statement by the physician that the physician

    (i)  has examined the person or patient on the date or dates set out, and

    (ii)  is of the opinion that the person or patient is a person with a mental disorder,

    (b) the reasons in summary form for the opinion, and

    (c) a statement, separate from that under paragraph (a), by the physician that the physician is of the opinion that the person to be admitted, or the patient admitted, under subsection (1)

    (i)  requires treatment in or through a designated facility,

    (ii)  requires care, supervision and control in or through a designated facility to prevent the person's or patient's substantial mental or physical deterioration or for the protection of the person or patient or the protection of others, and

    (iii)  cannot suitably be admitted as a voluntary patient.

    (4) A medical certificate referred to in subsection (1) is not valid unless both it and the examination it describes are completed not more than 14 days before the date of admission.

    (5) A second medical certificate referred to in subsection (2) is not valid unless both it and the examination it describes are completed within the 48 hour period following the time of admission.

    (6) A medical certificate completed under subsection (1) in accordance with subsections (3) and (4) is authority for anyone to apprehend the person to be admitted, and for the transportation, admission and detention for treatment of that person in or through a designated facility.

    (7) A patient admitted under subsection (1) to an observation unit must be transferred to a Provincial mental health facility or psychiatric unit within the prescribed period after a second medical certificate is received under subsection (2) by the director of the observation unit unless the patient is

    (a) discharged, or

    (b) released on leave or transferred to an approved home under section 37 or 38.
    Duration of detention

    23  A patient admitted under section 22 may be detained for one month after the date of the admission, and the patient must be discharged at the end of that month unless the authority for the detention is renewed in accordance with section 24.
    Review of detention

    24  (1) Unless the patient has previously been discharged, authority for the detention of a patient may be renewed under this section as follows:

    (a) from the end of the period referred to in section 23 for a further period of one month;

    (b) from the end of any period of renewal under paragraph (a) for a further period of 3 months;

    (c) from the end of any period of renewal under paragraph (b) for a further period, or further successive periods, of 6 months.

    (2) During

    (a) every one month period referred to in section 23,

    (b) every further one month period referred to in subsection (1) (a), and

    (c) the last month of every 3 month or 6 month period referred to in subsection (1) (b) or (c),

    the director or a physician authorized by the director must examine the patient and either discharge the patient or record a written report of the examination and include in it the reasons of the director or physician for concluding that section 22 (3) (a) (ii) and (c) continues to describe the condition of the patient.

    (2.1) An examination under subsection (2) must include

    (a) consideration of all reasonably available evidence concerning the patient's history of mental disorder including

    (i)  hospitalization for treatment, and

    (ii)  compliance with treatment plans following hospitalization, and

    (b) an assessment of whether there is a significant risk that the patient, if discharged, will as a result of mental disorder fail to follow the treatment plan the director or physician considers necessary to minimize the possibility that the patient will again be detained under section 22.

    (2.2) If an examination under subsection (2) concludes that section 22 (3) (a) (ii) and (c) continues to describe the condition of the patient, the director or physician must renew under subsection (2) the authority for the detention of that patient.

    (3) The written report referred to in subsection (2) is a renewal of the authority for the detention of the patient referred to in that subsection.
    Board and review panels

    24.1  (1) The minister may establish a board consisting of the following members appointed after a merit based process:

    (a) a chair appointed by the minister;

    (b) members appointed by the minister after consultation with the chair.

    (2) From among the members of the board, the chair may establish one or more review panels to conduct hearings and for each review panel may

    (a) specify the number of its members,

    (b) appoint its members, and

    (c) designate a member to chair the panel.

    (3) A review panel must include

    (a) a medical practitioner,

    (b) a member in good standing of the Law Society of British Columbia or a person with equivalent training, and

    (c) a person who is not a medical practitioner or a lawyer.

    (4) For matters heard under this Act by review panels, the chair may

    (a) schedule the times the matters will be heard,

    (b) assign a matter for hearing to a review panel,

    (c) reassign a matter for hearing from one review panel to another review panel, or

    (d) schedule 2 or more review panels to hear separate matters at the same time.
    Application of Administrative Tribunals Act

    24.2  Sections 1 to 10, 11, 13 to 15, 18 to 20, 26 (5) to (7) and (9), 27, 30, 32, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40 (1) and (2), 44, 46.2, 48, 49, 55 to 57, 59, 60 (a) and (b) and 61 of the Administrative Tribunals Act apply to the board and members of review panels.
    Power to compel witnesses and order disclosure

    24.3  (1) At any time before or during a hearing, but before its decision, a review panel may make an order requiring a person

    (a) to attend an oral or electronic hearing to give evidence on oath or affirmation or in any other manner that is admissible and relevant to an issue in an application, or

    (b) to produce for the review panel or a party a document or other thing in the person's possession or control, as specified by the review panel, that is admissible and relevant to an issue in an application.

    (2) The review panel may apply to the court for an order

    (a) directing a person to comply with an order made by the review panel under subsection (1), or

    (b) directing any directors and officers of a person to cause the person to comply with an order made by the review panel under subsection (1).
    Hearing by review panel

    25  (1) A patient detained under section 22 is entitled, at the request of the patient or a person on the patient's behalf, to a hearing by a review panel

    (a) within a prescribed time after the commencement of a one month period, or further one month period, referred to in section 23 or in section 24 (1) (a),

    (b) within a prescribed time after the commencement of a 3 month period referred to in section 24 (1) (b), or

    (c) during any 6 month period referred to in section 24 (1) (c), within a prescribed time after 90 days after the conclusion of any previous hearing.

    (1.1) If a patient has been on leave or transferred to an approved home under section 37 or 38 for 12 or more consecutive months and a hearing under this section has not been requested or held within that period, the chair appointed under section 24.1 (1) (a) must review the patient's treatment record and, if satisfied from this record that there is a reasonable likelihood that the patient would be discharged following a hearing under this section, must order that a hearing under this section be held.

    (2) The purpose of a hearing under this section is to determine whether the detention of the patient should continue because section 22 (3) (a) (ii) and (c) continues to describe the condition of the patient.

    (2.1) A hearing by a review panel must include

    (a) consideration of all reasonably available evidence concerning the patient's history of mental disorder including

    (i)  hospitalization for treatment, and

    (ii)  compliance with treatment plans following hospitalization, and

    (b) an assessment of whether there is a significant risk that the patient, if discharged, will as a result of mental disorder fail to follow the treatment plan the director or a physician authorized by the director considers necessary to minimize the possibility that the patient will again be detained under section 22.

    (2.2) Despite any defect or apparent defect in the authority for the initial or continued detention of a patient detained under section 22, a review panel must conduct a hearing and determine whether the detention should continue because the factors in section 22 (3) (a) (ii) and (c) continue to describe the condition of the patient.

    (2.3) A review panel may proceed with a hearing

    (a) despite a defect or apparent defect in any form required under this Act, and

    (b) whether or not the patient has been transferred under section 22 (7) of this Act.

    (2.4) A person who satisfies the review panel that he or she has a material interest in or knowledge of matters relevant to the hearing may give evidence or make submissions at the hearing.

    (2.5) Unless the review panel orders otherwise, the hearing must be held in private.

    (2.6) The chair of a review panel may

    (a) exclude the patient from attendance at the hearing or any part of it, but only if the chair of the review panel is satisfied that the exclusion is in the best interests of the patient, or

    (b) make orders respecting the taking, hearing or reproduction of evidence as the chair of the review panel considers necessary to protect the interests of the patient or any witness.

    (2.7) At any time before a hearing begins, a patient may withdraw the request for the hearing.

    (2.8) The review panel must issue a determination described in subsection (2) no later than 48 hours after the hearing is completed and must issue its reasons no later than 14 days after the determination has been issued.

    (2.9) After a review panel has made a determination referred to in subsection (2.8), the chair of the review panel must, without delay, deliver a copy of the determination to the director and to the patient or the patient's counsel or agent, and if the patient is to be discharged the director must discharge the patient.

    (3) The chair appointed under section 24.1 (1) (a) may shorten the time period in subsection (1) (c) if

    (a) the chair considers it to be in the best interests of the patient, or

    (b) new information relative to the patient's detention has become available.

    (4) [Repealed 2004-45-118.]

    (4.1) If the hearing under subsection (2) concludes that section 22 (3) (a) (ii) and (c) continues to describe the condition of the patient, the review panel must determine under subsection (2) that the detention of the patient be continued.

    (5) to (8) [Repealed 2004-45-118.]

    (9) Records of the proceedings of a hearing must be kept by the review panel office for at least one year.
    Amendment to final decision

    25.1  (1) If a party applies or on the review panel's own initiative, the review panel may amend a final decision to correct any of the following:

    (a) a clerical or typographical error;

    (b) an accidental or inadvertent error, omission or other similar mistake;

    (c) an arithmetical error made in a computation.

    (2) Unless the review panel determines otherwise, an amendment under subsection (1) must not be made more than 30 days after all parties have been served with the final decision.

    (3) Within 30 days of being served with the final decision, a party may apply to the review panel for clarification of the final decision and the review panel may amend the final decision only if the review panel considers that the amendment will clarify the final decision.

    (4) The review panel may not amend a final decision other than in the circumstances described in subsections (1) to (3).

    (5) This section must not be construed as limiting the review panel's ability, on its own initiative or at the request of a party, to reopen an application in order to cure a jurisdictional defect.
    Repealed

    26–27  [Repealed 1998-35-14.]
    Emergency procedures

    28  (1) A police officer or constable may apprehend and immediately take a person to a physician for examination if satisfied from personal observations, or information received, that the person

    (a) is acting in a manner likely to endanger that person's own safety or the safety of others, and

    (b) is apparently a person with a mental disorder.

    (2) A person apprehended under subsection (1) must be released if a physician does not complete a medical certificate in accordance with section 22 (3) and (4).

    (3) Anyone may apply to a judge of the Provincial Court or, if no judge is available, to a justice of the peace respecting a person if there are reasonable grounds to believe that section 22 (3) (a) (ii) and (c) describes the condition of the person.

    (4) On application under subsection (3), the judge or justice may issue a warrant in the prescribed form if satisfied that

    (a) the applicant has reasonable grounds to believe that subsection (3) applies to the person respecting whom the application is made, and

    (b) section 22 cannot be used without unreasonable delay.

    (5) A warrant issued under subsection (4) is authority for the apprehension of the person to be admitted and for the transportation, admission and detention of that person for treatment in or through a designated facility.

    (6) On being admitted as described in subsection (5), a patient must be discharged at the end of 48 hours detention unless the director receives 2 medical certificates as described in section 22 (3).

    (7) On the director receiving 2 medical certificates as described in subsection (6), section 22 (6) and (7) applies to the patient.
    Prisoners and youth custody centre inmates

    29  (1) On receiving 2 medical certificates completed in accordance with section 22 concerning the mental condition of a person imprisoned or detained in

    (a) a correctional centre,

    (b) a youth custody centre, or

    (c) a prison or lockup operated by a police force or police department or by a designated policing unit or designated law enforcement unit, as those terms are defined in section 1 of the Police Act,

    the Lieutenant Governor in Council may order the removal of the person to a Provincial mental health facility.

    (2) When an order is made under subsection (1), the person in charge of the correctional centre, youth custody centre, prison or lockup must, in accordance with the order, cause the person to be transported to the Provincial mental health facility named in the order and send to the director of the Provincial mental health facility copies of the medical certificates.

    (3) A person transported to a Provincial mental health facility under subsection (2) must be detained in that or any other Provincial mental health facility the Lieutenant Governor in Council may order until the person's complete or partial recovery or until other circumstances justifying the person's discharge from the Provincial mental health facility are certified to the satisfaction of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, who may then order the person

    (a) back to imprisonment or detention if then liable to imprisonment or detention, or

    (b) to be discharged.

    (4) On receiving 2 medical certificates completed in accordance with section 22 concerning the mental condition of a person imprisoned or detained in

    (a) a correctional centre,

    (b) a youth custody centre, or

    (c) a prison or lockup operated by a police force or police department or by a designated policing unit or designated law enforcement unit, as those terms are defined in section 1 of the Police Act,

    the person in charge of the correctional centre, youth custody centre, prison or lockup may authorize the transfer of the person to a Provincial mental health facility.

    (5) The director of a Provincial mental health facility may admit to the facility the person authorized to be transferred under subsection (4) if the director receives copies of the 2 medical certificates from the person in charge of the correctional centre, youth custody centre, prison or lockup.

    (6) A person who is authorized to be transferred and is admitted under subsection (4) must be detained in the Provincial mental health facility until the person's complete or partial recovery, or until other circumstances justifying the person's discharge from the facility are certified to the satisfaction of the director, who must,

    (a) if the person is not liable to further imprisonment or detention, discharge the person, or

    (b) if the person is liable to further imprisonment or detention, return the person to the correctional centre, youth custody centre, prison or lockup from which the person was transferred.

    (7) If a person is detained in a Provincial mental health facility under subsection (3) or (6), the director may authorize that the person receive care and psychiatric treatment appropriate to the person's condition.

    (8) Sections 23 to 25 apply to the detention of a patient admitted under subsection (4) and subsection (6) (a) or (b) applies to a patient who is discharged under sections 23 to 25.

    (9) Section 33 applies to the transfer or admission of a person to a Provincial mental health facility under subsection (4), and subsection (6) (a) or (b) applies to a patient who is discharged under section 33.
    Detention under Criminal Code

    30  A person who, under the Criminal Code, is found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder or is found unfit on account of mental disorder to stand trial, and who is ordered to be detained in a Provincial mental health facility, must receive care and treatment appropriate to the condition of the person as authorized by the director.
    Deemed consent to treatment and request for a second opinion

    31  (1) If a patient is detained in a designated facility under section 22, 28, 29, 30 or 42 or is released on leave or is transferred to an approved home under section 37 or 38, treatment authorized by the director is deemed to be given with the consent of the patient.

    (2) A patient to whom subsection (1) applies, or a person on the patient's behalf, may request a second medical opinion on the appropriateness of the treatment authorized by the director once in each of the following periods:

    (a) a one month period referred to in section 23 or 24 (1) (a);

    (b) a 3 month period referred to in section 24 (1) (b);

    (c) a 6 month period referred to in section 24 (1) (c).

    (3) On receipt of a second medical opinion prepared as described in subsection (2), the director must consider whether changes should be made in the authorized treatment for the patient and authorize changes the director considers should be made.
    Direction and discipline of patients

    32  Every patient detained under this Act is, during detention, subject to the direction and discipline of the director and the members of the staff of the designated facility authorized for that purpose by the director.
    Application to court for discharge

    33  (1) In this section:

    "certificate" means

    (a) a request in writing made under section 20 (1) (a) (ii), or a report made under section 20 (4) respecting a patient admitted under section 20 (1) (a) (ii),

    (b) a medical certificate completed in accordance with section 22 (1) or (2), or a report or determination made under section 24 or 25, or

    (c) a warrant under section 28, 39 or 41;

    "patient" means

    (a) a person whose admission is requested, or a patient who is admitted, under section 20 (1) (a) (ii),

    (b) a patient who is detained under section 22, 28, or 42 or whose detention is renewed or continued under section 24 or 25, or

    (c) a person or patient for whom a medical certificate has been completed as required under section 22 (1), or a warrant has been issued under section 28, 39 or 41, and who has not been apprehended and admitted or returned to a designated facility in consequence;

    "psychiatrist" means a physician who is recognized by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia as being a specialist in psychiatry.

    (2) A patient, or a person on behalf of the patient, who believes that there is not sufficient reason or legal authority for a certificate respecting the patient may apply to the court for an order under subsection (8) (a), (b) or (c).

    (3) Nothing in this section affects the right of a patient or other person to apply for a writ of habeas corpus or other prerogative writ.

    (4) On hearing an application under subsection (2), the court may review the evidence, including

    (a) all records relating to the patient's admission to or detention in or through a designated facility, and

    (b) further evidence it considers relevant.

    (5) On hearing an application under subsection (2) concerning a patient detained under this Act, the court must

    (a) consider all reasonably available evidence concerning the patient's history of mental disorder including

    (i)  hospitalization for treatment, and

    (ii)  compliance with treatment plans following hospitalization, and

    (b) make an assessment of whether there is a significant risk that the patient, if discharged, will as a result of mental disorder fail to follow the treatment plan the director or a physician authorized by the director considers necessary to minimize the possibility that the patient will again be detained under section 22.

    (6) If the review under subsection (4) concludes that section 22 (3) (a) (ii) and (c) continues to describe the condition of the patient, the court must conclude that there is sufficient reason for the certificate.

    (7) If satisfied that there is sufficient reason and legal authority for the certificate, the court must reject the application made under subsection (2).

    (8) If not satisfied that there is sufficient reason or legal authority for the certificate, the court may make any of the following orders:

    (a) that the patient not be apprehended, transported or admitted to a designated facility under the certificate that gave rise to the application under this section;

    (b) that the patient not be apprehended, transported or admitted to a designated facility under a certificate made before the date of the order;

    (c) that the patient be discharged from the designated facility;

    (d) that within 10 days the director named in the order must obtain a report from a psychiatrist, stating

    (i)  that the psychiatrist has examined the patient at the director's request on the dates stated in the report,

    (ii)  whatever further information the psychiatrist considers relevant, and

    (iii)  whether or not, in the opinion of the psychiatrist for the reasons stated in the report, the patient

    (A)  is a person with a mental disorder,

    (B)  requires treatment in or through a designated facility,

    (C)  requires care, supervision and control in or through a designated facility to prevent the patient's substantial mental or physical deterioration or for the protection of the patient or the protection of others, and

    (D)  cannot suitably be admitted as a voluntary patient;

    (e) that the patient, if not detained in a designated facility at the time an order under paragraph (d) is made, attend before the psychiatrist for examination at a time and place appointed by the director.

    (9) On receiving a report made under an order under subsection (8) (d), the court must

    (a) reject the application made under subsection (2) if the court is satisfied that there is sufficient reason and legal authority for the certificate, and

    (b) make an order under subsection (8) (a), (b) or (c) if the court is satisfied that there is not sufficient reason or legal authority for the certificate.

    (10) If an order is made under subsection (8) (c), the director must immediately discharge the patient.
    Notice to involuntary patient

    34  (1) The director must give a notice to a patient on

    (a) the patient's detention in or through a designated facility under section 22 (1), 28 (5), 29 or 42 (1);

    (b) the patient's transfer to a designated facility under section 35;

    (c) a renewal of the patient's detention under section 24.

    (2) A notice under this section must be given in writing in the prescribed form and orally and must inform the patient of the following:

    (a) the name and location of the designated facility in or through which the patient is detained;

    (b) the right set out in section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

    (c) the provisions of sections 23 to 25, 31 and 33;

    (d) any other prescribed information.

    (3) If the director is satisfied that a patient was unable to understand the information in the notice at the time the notice was given to the patient, the director must give the notice again to the patient as soon as the director considers that the patient is capable of understanding the information in the notice.
    Notice to patient under 16 years of age

    34.1  (1) The director must give a notice to a patient on

    (a) the patient's admission to a designated facility under section 20 (1) (a) (ii), or

    (b) the making of a report under section 20 (4) in respect of the patient's admission under section 20 (1) (a) (ii).

    (2) A notice under this section must be given in writing in the prescribed form and orally and must inform the patient of the following:

    (a) the name and location of the designated facility to which the patient is admitted;

    (b) the right set out in section 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms;

    (c) the provisions of sections 21, 25, 31 and 33;

    (d) any other prescribed information.

    (3) If the director is satisfied that a patient was unable to understand the information in the notice at the time the notice was given to the patient, the director must give the notice again to the patient as soon as the director considers that the patient is capable of understanding the information in the notice.
    Advice to near relative

    34.2  (1) The director must send to a near relative of the patient a written notice setting out the patient's rights under sections 21, 23, 24, 25 and 33 immediately after

    (a) the admission of the patient to the designated facility under section 20 (1) (a) (ii), or

    (b) the admission and detention of the patient in the designated facility under section 22 (1) or 28 (5).

    (2) The director must give notice in the prescribed manner to a near relative of a patient immediately after

    (a) discharging the patient from the designated facility, or

    (b) receipt of a request under section 25 (1) from someone who is not a near relative of the patient.

    (3) On making an order under section 25 (1.1), the chair must give a notice of the order in the prescribed manner to a near relative of the patient.

    (4) If the director or chair has no information about the identity of the patient's near relatives, this section is sufficiently complied with if the notice is sent to the Public Guardian and Trustee.
    Transfers

    35  (1) If a transfer to another designated facility is considered beneficial to the welfare of a patient, the director may, by agreement with the director of the other designated facility, authorize the transfer and transfer the patient.

    (2) Despite subsection (1), if a person detained under section 29 is transferred, the transfer must be to a Provincial mental health facility and the transfer may only be made

    (a) with the approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, or

    (b) if the person is detained under section 29 (4) and (5), with the authorization of the person in charge of the correctional centre, youth custody centre, prison or lockup from which the person was transferred.

    (3) A director to whose designated facility a patient is transferred under this section has authority to detain the patient and the time limited by this Act for the doing of any thing runs as if the patient's detention were continuous in or through one designated facility.
    Discharge

    36  (1) The director may discharge a patient from the designated facility.

    (2) An application, request, medical certificate or warrant made or issued under this Act before the discharge of the patient with respect to whom it is made or issued is not effective after the discharge for the purposes of this Act.

    (3) If a person is discharged from a designated facility other than by the operation of section 41 (3), the director must, on receiving an application by or on behalf of the person, provide the person with a certificate of discharge, signed by the director, in the prescribed form.
    Leave

    37  Subject to section 40 and the regulations, if the director considers that leave would benefit a patient detained in the designated facility, the director may release the patient on leave from the designated facility providing appropriate support exists in the community to meet the conditions of the leave.
    Approved homes

    38  Subject to section 40 and the regulations, if the director considers that the transfer would benefit a patient detained in the designated facility, the director may transfer the patient to an approved home.
    Authority to detain continues despite leave or transfer

    39  (1) The release of a patient on leave or the patient's transfer to an approved home under section 37 or 38 does not, of itself, impair the authority for the patient's detention under this Act and that authority may be continued, according to the same procedures and to the same extent, as if the patient were detained in a designated facility.

    (2) Subject to the regulations, a patient who is on leave or has been transferred to an approved home under section 37 or 38 may, if the conditions of the patient's leave or transfer are not being met, be recalled

    (a) to the designated facility from which the patient was released or transferred, or

    (b) to another designated facility, if the transfer to that facility is authorized and agreed to under section 35.

    (3) Subject to the regulations, the director of a designated facility who recalls a patient under subsection (2), or to which a patient is recalled under subsection (2) as a result of a transfer under section 35, may issue a warrant in the prescribed form for the patient's apprehension and transportation to the designated facility to which the patient is recalled.

    (4) A patient who is recalled under subsection (2) while on leave that has lasted 6 or more consecutive months is deemed, for the purposes of sections 23 to 25, to have been admitted under section 22 (1) on the date of return to a designated facility as a result of the recall.
    Exception to rules about leave and approved homes

    40  Except as provided by order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, sections 37 and 38 do not apply to a patient

    (a) who was admitted to a Provincial mental health facility under section 29 or under the Criminal Code and remains liable to imprisonment or detention in a jail, prison or training school, or

    (b) who is detained in a Provincial mental health facility under the Criminal Code.
    Unauthorized absences

    41  (1) If a patient detained in a designated facility leaves the designated facility without having been released on leave or transferred to an approved home under section 37 or 38 or discharged under this Act, the director may, within 60 days after the date on which the patient leaves the facility, issue a warrant in prescribed form for the apprehension of the patient and the patient's transportation to the designated facility and the warrant is authority for the apprehension of the patient and the patient's transportation to the designated facility.

    (2) If a warrant is issued under subsection (1), all peace officers and other persons designated by the director must give any assistance required in the apprehension of the patient or the transportation of the patient to the designated facility.

    (3) Except as provided in subsection (4), after the end of 60 days from the date the patient leaves the designated facility under the circumstances set out in subsection (1), the patient is deemed to have been discharged from the designated facility.

    (4) If a patient detained in a designated facility leaves the designated facility under the circumstances set out in subsection (1) while charged with an offence or liable to imprisonment or considered by the director to be likely to endanger the patient's safety or the safety of others, even though the period of 60 days has elapsed since the date the patient left the designated facility, the director may issue a warrant in the prescribed form for the patient's apprehension and transportation to a designated facility and the warrant is authority for the patient's apprehension and transportation to the designated facility.

    (5) If a patient escapes during the course of transfer to a designated facility, both the director of the designated facility to which the patient was being transferred and the director of the designated facility from which the patient was being transferred may issue a warrant under this section.

    (6) A patient detained in a designated facility who leaves the designated facility under the circumstances set out in subsection (1) may be apprehended for the purpose of returning the patient to the facility, within 48 hours from the time the patient leaves, even though no warrant has been issued under this section.
    Transfer from another province

    42  (1) If a director receives a written request from an appropriate mental health authority of another province with respect to a person who, because of being a person with a mental disorder, is detained in a hospital or mental health facility in that other province, the director may authorize the taking into custody and transportation of the person to the designated facility and may admit that person.

    (2) On being admitted under subsection (1), the patient must be discharged at the end of 48 hours detention unless the director receives 2 medical certificates as described in section 22 (3).

    (3) On the director receiving 2 medical certificates as described in subsection (2), section 22 (6) and (7) applies to the patient.

    Part 4 — Regulations
    Power to make regulations

    43  (1) The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations referred to in section 41 of the Interpretation Act.

    (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations as follows:

    (a) prescribing forms, including the form of the warrant under section 28, 39 or 41;

    (b) governing the selection, approval and operation of approved homes and the payment of the cost of the maintenance of the patients in them;

    (c) governing the establishment, development, maintenance and management of services and designated facilities for the examination, diagnosis and treatment of persons with a mental disorder and the rehabilitation of patients;

    (d) governing the protection and custody of patients detained in designated facilities;

    (d.1) governing the reports to be made concerning patients detained in designated facilities;

    (e) governing the transfer of patients between designated facilities or to and from reciprocating jurisdictions;

    (f) concerning the acquisition and management of property under this Act;

    (g) prescribing standards for buildings or premises that are designated facilities and for the furnishings and equipment of these buildings or premises;

    (h) concerning the establishment and operation of a mental health clinic or service by a society, the standards of care to be observed in the clinic or in the provision of the service, their inspection and the rates or fees charged by the society;

    (i) concerning the licensing of premises as private mental hospitals, the conditions of the licence and the designation of the provisions of this Act that are applicable to private mental hospitals;

    (j) concerning follow up and after care services and rehabilitation programs for patients;

    (k) governing boarding home care services;

    (l) concerning the admission of patients to designated facilities or a particular designated facility, the care, treatment and maintenance of patients and the discharge of patients;

    (m) prescribing rules respecting the conduct of hearings, including the practice and procedure, under sections 23 to 25;

    (n) prescribing the period referred to in section 22 (7);

    (o) governing the release and recall of patients on leave or the transfer and recall of patients to or from approved homes, including the care, supervision, treatment, maintenance or rehabilitation of patients on leave or transferred to approved homes;

    (p) governing the appointment of directors;

    (q) governing the preparation of second medical opinions under section 31.

    Schedule

    [Schedule repealed 1998-35-20.]

    Copyright (c) Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    ____________________________________________________

    I JUST SIMPLY ADD: GOOD LUCK CANADA and your poor logic and mentality !
    You are not free people and humans ! You have become some kind of repressed "zombies" !
    They do not want you to say anything in public, nor public declarations !
    I had a draconian upbringing, and thus I hate draconian canadians as an adult !

    THESE DRACONIANS ABOVE OR THEIR OFFICES, HAVE PERMITTED THE
    WORST offences of human rights and torture, physical abuse, in their detention centers,
    that I had ever known !  I DO NOT GIVE YOU A PICTURE OF THE FAMOUS
    R.C.M.P. Police, as they are under orders, or act on their own , which could be worse ! 

    WELCOME TO A CANADIAN DISSIDENT AND DEFENDER OF HUMAN RIGHTS, against the communists-Cuban police state of Canada, and the Government of Canada !



    george f. thomson