Friday, July 13, 2012

...draconians for today...! it is "sticky"...!












13 July 2012 Last updated at 08:17 ET

Ethiopian blogger Eskinder Nega jailed for 18 years
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-18825538

"[[...A prominent Ethiopian journalist and blogger has been sentenced to 18 years in jail for violating the country's anti-terrorism legislation.

Eskinder Nega and 23 others were found guilty last month.

They were accused of links with US-based opposition group Ginbot Seven, which Ethiopia considers a terrorist organisation...]]"


...draconian mentalities, and freedom of speech controls, and with whom you even talk with, is what  we are slowly loosing, even in Canada: OUR FREEDOMS  !

..draconian "inquisitionary religious and non religious ones" never helped really to any progress to anything better. the proof is it produced deep "obscurantism"...!

...to be detained out of the blue, with no citation of parties involved, to be submitted to psychological torture and humiliation, with RCMP police presence and involvement, with no minimal due course of events, and both parties involved solutions, goes beyond the alleged benefit ! YOU HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, AND DEGRADED FROM A SELF PERSONA ADULT !

...things that happen in Ethiopia, are "sticky", and Canada has freedom under anti-terrorism, to intrude in anybody's privacy, and Canada is going more and more draconian !

...are we still ancient ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draco_%28lawgiver%29

.
.
.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

...what is freedom of speech and "hate speech"...!













Coyne: Why does Canada still have a hate speech law?

By Andrew Coyne, Postmedia News July 9, 2012
Read more: http://www.canada.com/news/Coyne+does+Canada+still+have+hate+speech/6907506/story.html#ixzz20HCne0k7

_____________________
all of this article
just in case Canada
and the RCMP forget !
_____________________

Hardly was there time to celebrate the demise of Section 13, the infamous provision of the Canadian Human Rights Act prohibiting "communication of hate messages," before we were reminded this was not the only unwarranted restriction on freedom of speech on the books.

Section 319.2 of the Criminal Code, for example, forbidding the "wilful" promotion of hatred "against any identifiable group," is currently getting a workout in a Regina courtroom in the case of Terry Tremaine, a sometime math lecturer and avowed neo-Nazi. While Tremaine will have available to him the sorts of due process rights denied to those hauled before the human rights tribunals — the defence of truth among them — the end result is much the same: the suppression of speech society finds objectionable, for the sole reason that it is objectionable. If convicted, he faces up to two years in jail.

The National Post, in an editorial, made the case that such prosecutions only provide a platform for the promotion of the very ideas that were supposedly so toxic as to require suppression. In the age of the Internet, moreover, only a tiny fraction of such material is ever likely to be caught in the state's web, raising questions as to what, if anything, is being achieved.

But these are practical arguments. I want to raise a more fundamental objection. Societies that maintain such laws, after all, are making a statement about who and what they are, the sorts of principles they value and why.

I'll make the customary disclaimer here: freedom of speech is indeed not absolute. But the classical exceptions developed over the centuries — libel, fraud, and so on — typically find justification in the concept of harm. It isn't enough that the speech is considered offensive. It must be shown to have caused, or be likely to cause, some demonstrable harm to some identifiable person.

This begins from the recognition of what an extraordinary thing it is, in a free society, for the state to stop up people's mouths. Speech is not merely useful for debating political ideas. It is innate to us as human beings, built into our very thought processes: to prevent us from speaking is the next thing to preventing us from thinking. The burden of proof must therefore be on those who would seek to restrict freedom of speech, and not on those who wish merely to enjoy that freedom. And that burden must be a heavy one.

How heavy? In a criminal trial, as everyone knows, the accused enjoys the presumption of innocence. The state is required to prove his guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt." What is more, there are no exceptions. Often the law requires the courts to weigh one principle against another, most famously via the Charter's "reasonable limits" clause. But in a criminal trial, the requirement to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt is absolute.

To deprive someone of their freedom of speech is perhaps not so grave a matter as to deprive them of their physical liberty. But it is not that far off. It is defensible in certain limited cases, and only with the most rigorous justification. The harm asserted, therefore, cannot be vague or subjective. It must be of a kind that others can agree is harm. That is why the classical exceptions have tended to focus on individuals, and on the more tangible forms of harm.

Physical injury is an obvious example. And indeed, the ban on hate speech is often justified by invoking the threat of violence. But there are other areas of the Criminal Code to deal with that. For example, Section 319.1, the section just before the one in dispute, outlaws inciting hatred against an identifiable group "where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace." The purpose of 319.2, then, can only be to cover cases where no such breach is likely.

Is there another kind of harm that would justify its imposition? Hurt feelings, as I've said, aren't enough: all sorts of things can cause subjective offence, with no objective basis for distinguishing between them. Attempts have been made to draw an analogy to libel, on the grounds that hate speech amounts to defamation of an entire group. But the broader and more abstract the claim of harm, the harder it is to show.

Probably the strongest case is that recently made by the American legal theorist Jeremy Waldron, in his book The Harm in Hate Speech. Hate speech, he argues, is nothing less than an assault on the dignity of the targeted groups, robbing them of the "implicit assurance" a just society owes to all of its citizens: that they are accepted as members of that society. Without such assurance, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, for them to participate fully in the community.

I can see that applying, in a society where such views were dominant. But a handful of neo-Nazis? How is anyone's membership in society threatened because somebody, somewhere, has an Adolf Hitler decoder ring? Perhaps it might be argued that it is only the law that prevents the few from becoming the many: that in its absence, hatred would be, not the exception, but the rule.

Yet that is not the experience of free societies. Rather, it is in backward dictatorships that hatred of minorities is most virulent. How, indeed, does the impulse arise to protect vulnerable groups in this way except amid the general climate of tolerance of others that is the very basis of freedom of speech? Is it the ban on hate speech, then, that protects them, or the broader absence of such limits?
© Copyright (c) Postmedia News
________________________


...we clearly have here in this article, the steps of repression of a Dictatorship and/or Police State...!

REPRESSION "CANADA" OR OTHER:
...[.] communication of anything defined to them as "hate"...!
...[.] freedom of speech ...!
...[.] freedom of thought ...!
...[.] physical freedom...!
...[.] physical damage or torture, psychological forced torture...!
...[.] policing of un-armed fringe groups...!
...[.] freedom of hate speech...!
...[.] persecution of connections, activities, family, friends...!


...hence no rights to public manifestations for any right...!

MY HATE SPEECH IS AS FOLLOWS:

...orthodox jews and bible followers:

[.] we will send manna from heaven in a 40 year tour of the sahara or other dessert !
[.] we will resurrect your jesus after 40 years dead, as the catholics resurrected Mary recently[~1800's] from no-where, by the Catholic Church, which all Catholics believe...!
[.] we are earnestly awaiting for millions of bible followers to disappear in the 2nd coming of jesus for you's all dummies !
[.] we are earnestly awaiting for all armies to fight against your celestial jesus in the book of revelations at meguido !



 

...the correct education and moral and ethics in schools and pure logic centers is the future ! but not a fear to a imaginary "eternal hell-inferno-lake of fire"...! 

...those who destroy historic values : like that of pure logic, is not what pure logic does ...!  to leave what is as no more advance in human logic, is as bad or worse than the "dark middle ages"...!


http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/category/free-speech/
.
.
.

...earthwatch . org - environment activists !















EARTHWATCH in Brazil

http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2012/07/09/earthwatch-in-brazil-6/

http://travel.mongabay.com/pix/peru/aerial-rainforest-Aerial_1026_3217.html



George Thomson

10:23 AM on 7/10/2012

Earthwatch.org works on protecting the environment. It is proof that humans activity in devastating forests, jungles, for money and needs, is wrongly believed and permitted, over "surviving" of the Planet our only home ! ABSURD ! And Governments are the only ones to blame !

...simply World governments believe there in no end road to Environment destruction...! or that what is being destroyed, can be salvaged or technology can replace or fix up !


...ADDITIONALLY, no religion that believes in all the Bible, and Jesus fighting a WAR battle, in Revelations directly with World Governments, and this Earth being all burned and a New Earth, BELIEVE IN DOING MUCH for this Earth and World: essentially proof of their enormous bogus intentions, of benifit !
.
.
.

Monday, July 9, 2012

...Syria again and what a revolution is...!











http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/09/assad-interview-video-and-transcript


Governments control and governance, can be as ASSAD, an issue of pride or narcissistic control, including too many benefiting under him. What makes the change is what is occurring : An opposition managed to get "firepower" capacity to cause instability ! Plus the Assad government was too repressive and violent !
--------------
Imagine what it would take for any positive change in Canada or elsewhere ! Government reacts the same way to any non- armed revolution for positive improvements. No need to imagine police swat teams, or even army incursions on any "armed revolution" !
---------------
But nobody is going to do a vote political non armed revolution ! Government is controlled ! Meaning changes will take many, many years , if ever ! Especially if they are determined there are no changes to make ! The old status - quo is unchangeable !
---------------
So essentially Syria and ASSAD are way behind Canada in many things ! And Canada is way behind in many better things ! USA, is a bit of everything, from ancient death penalty by the State, to anything that the UK is and USA is not !


.
.
.


Sunday, July 8, 2012

...United Nations big poverty and hunger actions !


























United Nations Development Programme
Poverty Reduction

Economic growth will not reduce poverty, improve equality and produce jobs unless it is inclusive. Inclusive growth is also essential for the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The globalization process, when properly managed, becomes an important ingredient for inclusive growth. In this context, UNDP works to make real improvements in people’s lives, opening up their choices and opportunities.
Our Goals

UNDP promotes inclusive and sustainable human development and works to reduce poverty in all its dimensions. We focus our efforts on making growth and trade benefit everyone in developing countries.
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/povertyreduction/overview.html


Environment and Energy
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourwork/environmentandenergy/overview.html

The poor are disproportionately affected by environmental degradation and lack of access to clean, affordable energy services. UNDP helps countries strengthen their capacity to address these challenges at the global, national and community levels, seeking out and sharing best practices, providing innovative policy advice and linking partners through pilot projects.
Our Goals

UNDP strengthens national capacity to manage the environment in a sustainable manner to advance poverty reduction efforts. Through our country teams in 135 developing countries, we help our partners build their capacity to integrate environmental considerations into development plans and strategies, establish effective partnerships, secure resources, and implement programmes to support sustainable, low-carbon, climate-resilient development pathways.

Rio+20 Sustainable Development Summit

The 2012 UN Conference on Sustainable Development, or “Rio+20” is a forum on how to make sustainable development a reality for seven billion people today, and to define the future we want for nine billion by 2050.
_____________________________________

http://www.wfp.org/



...the definition of "POVERTY" in pure logic, is a self incrimination result of WORLD GOVERNMENTS...! THEY BELIEVE, PRODUCE, POVERTY AND PEASANTS ! They run GOVERNMENTS BANKS AND INTEREST RATES, as one big example of Canada, and USA...!

...results of RIO+20 were only on paper with no real action, as they project a World of 9BILLION humans by 2050...! This will be the tipping point if 7BILLION isn't already the tipping point to "un-sustainablitity" ! Especially under their WORLD MARKETS CAPITALISTIC MODEL of COMPETITION...!

...if they believe in a WORLD of 9BILLLION humans...! and what was implied, that they cannot do anything about, nor will do anything, is a clear "ultimatum", they believe in making DOOM SCENARIOS !

...Canada is said to be wanting to leave the UNITED NATIONS ! And where is Canada's help for World poverty and hunger ?
.
.
.




Saturday, July 7, 2012

...rights, rules and laws...!














RULES AND RIGHTS AND LAWS


Canadians are the first people that I know that have
given up their basic rights ! Must be on false
pretenses of apparent public control, quietness,
and cleanness ! To do such a sacrifice, means that
they clearly have lost sense of the meaning of many
things, including the difference between a "rule",
a "right", and a "law"...!

For example:

A woman can "sell" her body, commonly known as a
prostitute. The rules and laws might be that it
is not allowed ! But her right is, that that is her
right ! It is her physical body ! Does she have the
need for this ? The answer is: I did not make the
lack of money, or social classes ! Not did I make
the need for street drugs !

Canada's government has traversed the boundaries 

of physical contact in their public control. Which 
defines a Dictatorship, in which bodily or mental 
torture is used for public control, political oppression, 
or other ! To outweigh benefits with methods used, 
is a misnomer in this case and many others ! Meaning 
clearly that we are in the hands of ignorant ancient 
persons or simply evil or worse anti-human !

Any physical contact, or any force, or any obliged
ingestion, or obliged signing of anything, other than
detention or time out, opposes, any humanity
progress acquired over so many years !

It clearly declares and affirms, their willful ignorance,
of not knowing any better and correct methods ! It is
proof of their failed education and economic system !

Can this system of Canada last ? Of course it can !
But at a great human rights cost ! It is similar to 

having animals in a cage. They will never do anything 
wrong to anybody ! Until they get out !

The minimum rights, is that under certain decibels 

of  tonality or volume, you can freely say anything 
you want ! Plus many other things. And I am sorry but 
what is insured so it is. And what isn't is not ! You can 
have your rules,  but there are supposed to be laws for 
this. How do you stop pranks and small damages, 
City rubbish, painting of things, etc...? You have 
occupational programs and full employment ! If there 
is too much rubbish, you use plenty of "dodo's" to 
pick it up ! A cars paint got scratched. It has to be 
repaired or accumulative repair done. Car mechanics 
is another thing which insurance is too dear or there 
is none for !

The same as what is done in your house design of 

water piping and electricity. Usage percentage, 
means everybody will not prank. And if there is 
nothing to be upset about, and plenty other occupations, 
nobody would have the time to prank !

Normally people of good living do not have time for 

"pranks" ! That is the answer ! And I did not again,
make the need nor the lack of well living and being !

What the Government of Canada is doing is what you 

can define, as a final measure of despair ! There is 
only worse beyond their way of doing things. Which 
would be worse than a Banana Republic ! Actually it is 
amazing that under such logic, they have Universal 
Health care and Government economic meager 
assistance !




I must add that under any repressive Government 
system you engender deep desires of "freedom" ! But 
Canadians have lost this definition of "freedom" !

Their system does not control me, nor has taught me 
anything ! All I have learned is to be "repressed" ! I 
come from where these controls do not exist ! And as 
adults we attend normally to our problems. You do not 
look for a fight, you make a conversational response, 
and otherwise you ignore ! Anything else has 
Prefecture ways of citations. After further problems,
Prefectures use Policing and Courts. Canadians do 
irresolute issues for meager public control with no 
justice resolution. And are the biggest "tit-for tat" 
non-balanced I have ever known ! Their "tit-for-tat" 
even can be death by any means not criminally defined 
or a accident ! Really a very senseless logic !

Their system of control over "children style minds 
with adult bodies",  makes a dead-end road to any 
progress! It is a false reality of quietness, cleanliness, 
and apparent good behavior ! They do not need progress ! 
They gave up their "personas" ! It is a aberration of 
justice ! Some still try to escape on occasions South
to USA for some burning off of steam !

ONCE AGAIN THE AFFIRMATIONS OF MY RIGHTS ARE:

 "...I PREFER a bit rubbished or dirty house, home or CITY, for my freedom of speech, and normal behavior of freedom of presence, THAN WHAT CANADA CONSIDERS TO BE "NORMAL"...!"

"...I PREFER to be me, and not any CANADIAN that I know so far, nor anyone, or RCMP Police racist, narcisist, megalonomanic, communist, extreme controlling, will control me thus, and I will be this that I am, in CANADA, and anywhere !"

"...I PREFER the truth, than imaginary beliefs on "paper" in a book, be it RELIGION , or ACADEMIA EVOLUTION...! AS I AM ME, and nobodies else's desires of control over me...!"

"...I PREFER "HEAVEN" HERE than an imaginary one to never come...!"

"...I PREFER TO BE ABLE TO SAY WHAT I WANT, so that I do not go on, being a "dumb-bell" that could not say anything for yourself...!"

"...I PREFER TO OPPOSE anything I do not believe, so that as equally others are told wrong things, they do not believe for ever stories and lies...!"

"...I PREFER TO BE ME, than what Canada Mental Health Act, believes I should be, or want me to be...!, or anybody else...!"

"...I WILL BE ME, and not what anybody else thinks is better for me, other than what my parents taught me and I learned normally from "normal" sources... !

" I AM ME, BECAUSE I COME FROM A WELL EDUCATED UNIVERSITY BACKGROUND, AND no-education rights, even non-government funded, is another misnomer of CANADA...!"


George F. Thomson

.
.
.




 

...we could not miss this further venezuelanism...!











...we could not miss this further venezuelanism...!

HUGO CHÁVEZ : EL PEOR DE TODOS EN TODO  
Subversivo contrademocrático desde 1980
HUGO Rafael CHÁVEZ : The worst of all and
in all !
Subversive counter-democratic since 1980 !

I will not translate this, so that the
profetico be not true ! Or the truth be
not profetico !

http://porlaconciencia.com/?p=6755

__________________________________

[["...El menos calificado y  más descalificado para determinar quiénes somos y quiénes no somos venezolanos, muchísimo menos aún si lo hace en función de quién lo apoya y quién lo adversa

En uno de sus raptos de desafuero cada vez más frecuentes y cada vez más grotescos, Hugo Chávez se ha atrevido –atrevimiento inaceptable e intolerable— a intentar arrebatarnos  la nacionalidad venezolana  a quienes,  por millones,  disentimos, criticamos, nos oponemos, despreciamos, repudiamos y sentimos severo asco por su acción política  y su gestión gubernamental. ¿Quién se cree que es? ¿Cuánto cree que vale realmente como político, como gobernante  y como ciudadano?  ¿Cuánto cree que saben o ignoran los venezolanos de su acción política y de su gestión gubernamental, de sus vicios y defectos, delitos y crímenes?

Los vahos del poder  y el lamido servil de los arrastrantes  aduladores lo han hecho elevarse del suelo (valor real)   a la estratosfera (sobrevalor megalomaníaco). Como somos parte de los millones a quienes se nos ha pretendido arrebatar nada menos que nuestra nacionalidad por no prosternarnos ante él y sus secuaces y no lamer sus botas de militarista totalitario,  en ejercicio del derecho a réplica –para lo cual, afortunadamente, no necesitamos sentencia del Tribunal Superior de…–   le decimos al poder megalómano que le queda grande, galaxialmente grande, esa pretensión de sentirse superior a todos los venezolanos, sobre todo superior a los venezolanos no castrochavistas, quienes,  por cierto, en su totalidad y  hasta el más modesto de merecimientos, no tienen ni los vicios ni los defectos que él ha mostrado tener,  y no han incurrido en los delitos y los crímenes en los que él ha incurrido, tal como lo han publicado miles de veces  los medios de comunicación independientes en estos trece años y seis meses de tragedia sociopolítica.

Son esas numerosas publicaciones las que nos permiten no tener que limitarnos a  frases simplistas y simplonas, como es su estilo,  sino poder respaldar nuestras afirmaciones con material hemerográfico, bibliográfico y documental muchísimo más que suficiente. Por eso, con sobrado soporte probatorio debidamente archivado podemos afirmar que Hugo Chávez es el menos calificado y el más descalificado para quitarle a nadie nada, mucho menos algo tan sagrado como la nacionalidad, porque, en todo, es el peor de todos en toda nuestra historia.

  El peor, por ser el más ignorante y  el más incapaz para gobernar bien, por ser el más irresponsable en  sus acciones, por haber ejercido la presidencia a base de solamente abusos de poder violando cotidianamente la Constitución  Nacional y leyes de la República; por haber reclutado y puesto a su servicio incondicional a la peor escoria de la sociedad venezolana para así  conformar el peor gobierno de nuestra historia en todos los sentidos; por haber presidido omnímodamente el gobierno más dilapidador, más malversador  y más corrupto de todos los tiempos, tanto en el número y modalidad de los casos como en las enormes cantidades afectadas;  por haber presidido el gobierno de menor nueva obra realizada, de haber llevado al más bajo nivel los servicios públicos, de haber permitido por carencia de mantenimiento el mayor deterioro de la infraestructura del país, etc., no obstante haber dispuesto de todo el poder institucional  y de una inmensa cantidad de recursos (1) como para haber realizado la mejor gestión gubernamental del mundo, en términos absolutos en relación con países de igual o menor tamaño económico  y en términos relativos en relación con  países  de mayor dimensión económica, incluyendo las mayores potencias económicas mundiales; por haber conspirado, siendo oficial militar,  contra la democracia representativa, consagrada en la Constitución Nacional,  entre 1980 y 1992;  por haber destruido hasta ahora gran parte del  sistema político democrático  representativo con falsos argumentos y con el único objetivo de eliminar la posibilidad de controles y sanciones a la ejecución de su estrategia capital destructiva y a la prosecución de su objetivo supremo de instauración de un régimen militarista totalitario; por haber destruido gran parte de las empresas independientes del país para eliminar la fuente de prevención del sector privado ante el intento de imponerle un régimen totalitario, para reducir el ámbito de relativa evasión de la acción opresiva y represiva del gobierno, y para ampliar el campo de dominio gubernamental a costa de la disminución del sector privado; por el asalto a la fuerza de  los ámbitos de dominio privado para pasarlos al “dominio del sector público”, eufemismo por lo que es en verdad  el dominio del castrochavismo; por otros delitos y crímenes que deben quedar sin mención por razones de espacio.                 (1) Según estimaciones de privado acopio  –el gobierno suele mantener reserva sobre sus ingresos–,  la revolución castrochavista ha recibido, en los trece años y seis meses que lleva en el poder y  por distintos conceptos, el equivalente a 1 billón 300 mil millones de dólares, muchísimos más que los suficientes para resolver todos, absolutamente todos  los problemas económicos de Venezuela, y para haber puesto en marcha el plan de desarrollo económico y social de muy lejos más importante de nuestra historia y del mundo, guardando en este último caso las debidas proporciones.  Sobre esos fondos nunca ha rendido cuenta, ni querrá ni podrá rendirla, porque por los medios de comunicación sabemos que han sido malversados, dilapidados y sustraídos por las más disímiles formas de corrupción

Por eso puede afirmarse, con el apoyo referencial de numerosos hechos recogidos y publicados en medios de comunicación de toda índole, informes, documentos y relatorías diversas, que Hugo Chávez es en nuestro país  el peor gobernante, el peor político, el peor oficial militar, el peor ciudadano, el peor individuo, el peor ser social, el peor venezolano, en fin, el peor de todos en todo.  Por lo tanto es el menos calificado y el más descalificado para determinar quiénes somos y quiénes no somos venezolanos, mucho menos si lo hace en la forma tan torpe de utilizar como criterio de arrebato quién lo apoya o quién lo adversa.

La subversión contrademocrática en el poder

 Durante los trece años y seis meses  que la revolución castrochavista lleva en el poder, ha recibido, de un número creciente de venezolanos que hoy son millones, cuestionamientos cada vez más severos a su forma autoritaria de gobernar, y asimismo de críticas cada vez más serias a los vicios y defectos, delitos y crímenes en los que ha incurrido para mantenerse y afianzarse en el poder y llevar adelante su proyecto político militarista totalitario. Los señalamientos, cada vez mayores en gravedad y número, han provenido de dirigentes partidistas, líderes sociales o mayormente de meros ciudadanos, desde una posición opositora, disidente o crítica, a lo largo y a lo ancho del país.

Durante trece años y seis  meses, asimismo, la revolución castrochavista  nunca ha respondido argumentos con argumentos, ni acusaciones con defensa, ni críticas con información o explicación. Su respuesta ha sido siempre la misma: descalificaciones  insultantes y ofensivas o agresiones de variada  índole  a todo aquél que opine o actúe en contraposición o de manera diferente  al régimen, sea venezolano o extranjero, sea cual fuere su nivel social, en fin, trátese de quien se trate:  “corruptos, ladrones, cachorros del imperio, agentes o lacayos del imperialismo y/o de la oligarquía y/o de la burguesía, golpistas, fascistas, pitiyanquis, conspiradores para la desestabilización o el magnicidio, enemigos del sistema democrático, conspiradores contra la democracia y contra el pueblo, apátridas, traidores a la Constitución Nacional y a la patria…”, etc.

Como los poderes públicos  actúan como meras marionetas electrónicas, por la velocidad con que ejecutan sus órdenes, una acusación pública de Hugo Chávez o de cualquiera de sus secuaces en el poder, independientemente de todo lo infundada que ella sea, suele significar la puesta en marcha de un proceso que ha de terminar  en una sanción. Son testimonios fehacientes de ello las decenas de venezolanos presos, condenados no obstante que nada pudo probárseles, o los miles de  compatriotas que han tenido que salir involuntaria y precipitadamente  de Venezuela huyéndole a una injusta condena.

La lección del fracaso guerrillero              

 La guerrilla de los años ’60 del siglo pasado tuvo como estrategia capital el derrocamiento del sistema democrático representativo, en función del objetivo fundamental de instaurar un régimen revolucionario  de corte  castrista, régimen del cual venía todo su impulso.

 Según las crónicas sobre el evento guerrillero, dos de los factores fundamentales de su derrota fueron la acción eficaz de las Fuerzas Armadas y el vacío de apoyo popular a una acción que se proponía destruir el sistema democrático.  Por lo tanto, quedó claro que en el futuro una nueva acción subversiva contrademocrática debería evitar enfrentamiento abierto con las Fuerzas Armadas y  tenía también que enmascararse como democrática.

 QUIÉN ES EN VERDAD HUGO CHÁVEZ

 Hugo Chávez entra a la política como conspirador subversivo contrademocrático

 Con posterioridad a su derrota,   ex-guerrilleros decidieron reencaminar su proyecto subversivo  fomentando una conspiración  dentro de la propia institución castrense que antes los había derrotado. Se  aspiraba a que, por emerger el golpe del seno  de las FFAA, se podría eludir el riesgo de que fuera derrotada  nuevamente por ella misma. Se  decidió así mismo que la bandera del golpe no sería la destrucción de la democracia –aunque en verdad era eso y no otra cosa lo que en realidad se buscaba–, sino, muy por el contrario, el derrocamiento  del gobierno para “limpiar a la democracia” de sus vicios y defectos, delitos y crímenes.

A comienzos del año 1980,  ex-guerrilleros en plan de activismo subversivo entraron en contacto con el entonces teniente Hugo Chávez,  por mediación de su hermano mayor Adán, y lo captaron como uno de los  operadores de su plan conspirativo.  Se acordó que la insurrección  se daría “cuando existieran las condiciones subjetivas y objetivas propicias”.  No sería, pues, un golpe sedicioso contra un gobierno ni contra un presidente determinados, sino contra el sistema democrático como tal, el mismo que estaba consagrado en la Constitución Nacional entonces vigente, a la cual debía lealtad por juramento todo integrante de las FF.AA.

Al aceptar incorporarse a la conspiración golpista subversiva contrademocrática, el teniente Hugo Chávez aceptó tácitamente quebrantar el juramento de lealtad a las Fuerzas Armadas de las cuales formaba parte; y al comprometerse a insurgir  contra el sistema político consagrado en  la Constitución Nacional, asumía asimismo abjurar de su lealtad constitucional.  Convino por lo tanto en echarse  a andar como traidor a las Fuerzas Armadas, a la Constitución Nacional, a la Patria y en suma al pueblo venezolano. Iniciaba así una larga tarea de subversión del sistema democrático representativo que aún hoy mantiene desde el poder constituido. Todo ello a los 25 años de edad y apenas con el grado de teniente.  Comenzó así una carrera política sucia y tenebrosa, que lo ha llevado a constituir, conjuntamente con los hermanos Castro, el trío de peores gorilas del continente americano.

Una carrera de dobleces que aún perdura

 Así se inició Hugo Chávez en una carrera política que ha estado signada por mentiras y engaños, simulación y farsa, trampas y fraudes, demagogia y cinismo, siempre haciendo ocultamente lo contrario de lo que públicamente dice estar haciendo.

Desde su incorporación a la conjura golpista  a comienzos de 1980 hasta el 4 de febrero de 1992, tuvo que mentir y fingir  por imperativo de su propia supervivencia dentro de las Fuerzas Armadas. En esos doce años desarrolló un  regusto creciente por la mentira y el engaño, Al día de hoy, su vida política no ha sido sino una gran mentira continuada, en la que  dice y se desdice con descarada facilidad, proclamándose el mayor demócrata mientras él y sus secuaces han desatado la mayor ferocidad destructiva contra la democracia venezolana.

El carácter inherente  de tales vicios y defectos se ha acentuado tanto, que ha terminado por ser condición natural de su forma de ser como político y como persona. Cuarenta años de dobleces han determinado que el Hugo Chávez de hoy haya llegado a ser, por naturaleza, intrínsecamente mentiroso y engañoso, simulador y farsante, tramposo y fraudulento, demagogo y cínico.

En febrero de 1992 el golpe contrademocrático producto de la conspiración emerge con la máscara de “rebelión cívico-militar”, criticando ferozmente los vicios, defectos, delitos y crímenes de los gobiernos democráticos y enarbolando falsas banderas de  auténtica democracia, honestidad administrativa, justicia, libertad y progreso social. Todo mentira.

Purgó prisión por golpista y al salir de la cárcel por inexplicable indulto presidencial, se echó a las calles  del país con un discurso de enardecido doliente de la democracia agraviada por los gobiernos civiles. Discurso que subió de tono agresivo y de contundencia crítica contra los “malos demócratas”  y se explayó en oferta democrática durante su campaña electoral presidencial de 1998.

Trece años y tres meses en el poder han demostrado, de manera contundente y fehaciente, que sus críticas a los regímenes anteriores y sus ofertas políticas y sociales no fueron otra cosa que un largo rosario de mentiras y engaños. En esos largos años el gobierno castrochavista ha incurrido en un número muchísimo mayor de vicios, defectos, delitos y crímenes que aquéllos  que ferozmente les criticó a los ocho gobiernos civiles anteriores, y no solamente no ha cumplido la mayor parte de sus promesas de auténtico desarrollo político y social, sino que ha dedicado toda la potencia de su acción política y de su gestión gubernamental a ejecutar su estrategia capital de destrucción de la democracia y  a lograr su objetivo supremo de instaurar un régimen militarista totalitario de hegemonía total sobre la sociedad venezolana...]]"
___________________________________



...i must add to this venezuelanism, that all indicates that Chavez is the biggest "liar" Venezuela has had...! THAT THEY BELIEVE IN SUPERSTITIONS...! AND THAT THEY "SCRIPT" MANY THINGS EVEN ONTO THEMSELVES...!

...that those that have left, or are part of this Chavez mentality in some manner, or truly left, to escape such "monsters", "depraved", "degrading", "depersonalizing", mentality...! in which one group of power displaced and/or assimilated all around it, to its liking, in which everything is and isn't [ no real conscience ], and the poor are still poor...!

...i must further add, to this profetico, that all Venezuelans, might be caught up, in a "regresive" WORLD brainwashing mentality, of myths and fables, with a mix of Religion and Evolution...!
.
.
.